Compositional development of performance models in POEMS

International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 283-291

  Browne, J C ^a,c   Berger, E ^a   Dube, A ^b  

^a University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ASSOCIATIVE PROCESSING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; DATA FLOW ANALYSIS; LINGUISTICS; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS SPANNING APPLICATIONS; PERFORMANCE MODELS; PERFORMANCE-ORIENTED END-TO-END MODELING SYSTEM (POEMS); STRUCTURING MODEL;

COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0034538558     PISSN: 10943420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109434200001400401     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adve, V., Bagrodia, R., Browne, J. C., Deelman, E., Dube, A., Houstis, E., Rice, J., Sakellariou, R., Sundaram-Stukel, D., Teller, P., and Vernon, M. K. In press. POEMS: End-to-end performance design of large parallel adaptive computational systems. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering.
2. Bagrodia, R., and Liao, W. 1994. Maisie: A language for design of efficient discrete-event simulations. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 20:225-238.
3. Bayerdorffer, B. 1993. Associative broadcast and the communication semantics of naming in concurrent systems. Ph.D. diss., Department of Computer Sciences, University of Texas at Austin.
4. Bayerdorffer, B. 1995. Distributed programming with associative broadcast. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 25-35.
5. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., and Jacobson, I. 1999. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Burger, D., and Austin, T. M. 1997. The SimpleScalar Tool Set. Version 2.0, UW CS Technical Report 1442. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
7. Dube, A. 1998. A language for compositional development of performance models and its translation. Master's thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Austin.
8. Falknerhainer, B., and Forbus, K. 1991. Compositional modeling: Finding the right model for the job. Artificial Intelligence 51:95-153.
9. Gelernter, D., Carriero, N., Chandran, N., and Chang, S. 1985. Parallel programming in Linda. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing, pp. 255-263.
10. Lamport, L. 1978. Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system. Communications of the ACM 17:558-565.
11. Low, W.-H., Lim, C.-C., Cai, W., Huang, S.-Y., Jain, S., and Turner, S. J. 1999. Survey of languages and runtime libraries for parallel discrete event simulation. Simulation 72:170-186.
12. Newton, P., and Browne, J. C. 1992. The CODE 2.0 graphical parallel programming language. In Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Supercomputing, pp. 177-187.
13. Object Management Group. 1995. The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification. Revision 2. Needham, MA: Object Management Group.
14. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., and Lorensen, W. 1991. Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Sessions, R. 1997. COM and DCOM: Microsoft's Vision for Distributed Objects. New York: John Wiley.
16. Shlaer, S., and Mellor, S. 1992. Object Lifecycles: Modeling the World in States. New York: Yourdon.
17. SES. 1996. SES/Workbench 3.1 Users Reference Manual. Austin, TX: SES.