The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 541-557

  Jansen, Sylvia J T ^a   Stiggelbout, Anne M ^a   Nooij, Marianne A ^a   Kievit, Job ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Health related quality of life; Importance weights; Multiattribute utility theory; Utilities

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARD; TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 0034530668     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008917432368     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Constructing health state preference values from descriptive quality of life outcomes: Mission impossible?
2. Patient preferences concerning the trade-off between the risks and benefits of routine radiation therapy after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer
3. Relationship between health utility and psychometric health status measures
4. Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life
5. Health state utilities in knee replacement surgery: The development and evaluation of McKnee
6. Heterogeneity in the relationship between the standard-gamble utility measure and health-status dimensions
7. Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains
8. Measurement of patient-derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi-attribute scale
9. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2
10. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population
11. Quality of life assessment in a cross-cultural context: Use of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist in a multinational randomised trial comparing CMF and Zoladex (Goserlin) treatment in early breast cancer
12. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: An update and overview
13. Vragenlijst en introductie met betrekking tot kwaliteit van leven
14. The MOS 36-item Short-Form health status survey (SF-36): 1. Conceptual framework and item selection
15. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research
16. Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of respons error: A simulation study
17. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. A review
18. The use of weighted scores with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scales
19. A comparison of two approaches for assessing patient importance weights to conduct an Extended Q-TWiST analysis
20. The assessment of values in laryngeal cancer: Reliability of measurement methods
21. Ratings of the importance of quality of life variables: Therapeutic implications for patients with metastatic breast cancer