Who should be performing routine abdominal ultrasound? A prospective double-blind study comparing the accuracy of radiologist and radiographer

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 55, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 606-609

  Leslie, A ^a   Lockyer, H ^a   Virjee, J P ^a  

^a BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abdomen; Comparative studies; Diagnostic radiology; Kidney; Observer performance; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; AORTA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY EXAMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL EXPERT; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; SKILL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEAMWORK; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 0034523417     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/crad.2000.0491     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. An audit of an open access ultrasound service for direct referral from General Practitioners Proceedings of Radiology UK 1999
2. An audit of a radiographer based ultrasound service
3. An audit of the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound
4. Value of selective second-look sonography by radiologists