The duty to warn and protect - Impact on practice

Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 45, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 899-904

  Chaimowitz, G A ^a   Glancy, G D ^a   Blackburn, J ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Confidentiality; Duty to protect; Duty to warn; Tarasoff

Indexed keywords

CANADA; CONFIDENTIALITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MENTAL DISEASE; PSYCHIATRIST; REVIEW;

EID: 0034515162     PISSN: 07067437     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/070674370004501004     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Management of threats of violence under California's Duty-to-Protect statute
2. The clinician's duty to protect third parties
3. Post-Tarasoff legal developments and the mental health literature
4. Legal issues in medical management of violent and threatening patients
5. The psychotherapist's duty to protect third parties from harm
6. Tarasoff in the Canadian Context: Wenden and the Duty to Protect
7. Defining the physician's duty to warn: Consensus statement of Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform
8. Survey Shows Therapists Misunderstand Tarasoff Rule
9. Tarasoff and the clinician: Problems in fulfilling the duty to protect
10. Dangerousness, confidentiality, and the duty to warn
11. Confidentiality in crisis: Part I - The duty to inform
12. A survey of police officers experience with Tarasoff warnings in two states
13. Protecting third parties: A decade after Tarasoff
14. Anatomy of a second generation Tarasoff case
15. Warning third parties at risk of AIDS: APA's policy is a reasonable approach
16. Warning third parties at risk of AIDS: APA's policy is a barrier to treatment
17. Confidentiality in crisis: Part II - Confidentiality of treatment records
18. Tarasoff: Protective privilege versus public peril
19. The psychotherapist as witness for the prosecution: The criminalization of Tarasoff
20. The Hippocratic Oath: Test, translation & interpretation
21. Confidentiality and dangerousness in the doctor-patient relationship: The position of the Canadian Psychiatric Association
22. The so-called duty to warn: The psychotherapeutic duty to protect third parties from patients violent acts
23. Clinical assessment of the risk of violence among psychiatric inpatients
24. Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument
25. A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools
26. Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk
27. Dangerousness to risk assessment of community violence: Taking stock at the turn of the century
28. Smith v. Jones: Privileged communication versus the public interest
29. Commentary: Assessing the risk of violence - Are "accurate" predictions useful?