Portevin-Le Chatelier effect

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 62, Issue 6 B, 2000, Pages 8195-8206

  Franklin, Scott V ^a,b   Mertens, F ^a   Marder, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CRACK PROPAGATION; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; STRAIN RATE; TENSILE STRENGTH; YIELD STRESS;

PLASTIC YIELDING; PORTEVIN-LE CHATELIER EFFECTS;

PLASTIC DEFORMATION;

EID: 0034514444     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.8195     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. F. Mertens, S. V. Franklin, and M. Marder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4502 (1997).
2. A. Portevin and F. Le Chatelier, C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 176, 507 (1923).
3. F. A. von Gerstner, Ann. Chim. Phys. 26, 269 (1832).
4. F. Savart, Ann. Chim. Phys. 65, 337 (1837).
5. A. M. Masson, Ann. Chim. Phys. 3, 451 (1841).
6. A. H. Cottrell, Philos. Mag. 44, 829 (1953).
7. J. Bell, Mechanics of Solids (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1973), Vol. 1.
8. Y. Estrin and L. P. Kubin, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 137, 125 (1991).
9. S. V. Franklin, Doctoral thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, 1997.
10. S. H. van den Brink, A. van den Beukel, and P. G. McCormick, Phys. Status Solidi A 30, 469 (1975).
11. P. G. McCormick, Acta Metall. 36, 3061 (1988).
12. P. G. McCormick and C. P. Ling, Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 1969 (1995).
13. P. Penning, Acta Metall. 20, 1169 (1972).
14. A. Rosen and S. R. Bodner, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 15, 47 (1966).
15. S. R. Bodner and A. Rosen, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 15, 63 (1966).
16. C. P. Ling and P. G. McCormick, Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 2631 (1990).
17. S. V. Franklin and M. Marder, in Plastic and Fracture Instabilities in Materials, edited by N. Ghoniem (ASME, New York, 1995), p. 133.
18. H. M. Zbib and E. C. Aifantis, Scr. Metall. 22, 1331 (1988).
19. Y. Estrin, Scr. Metall. Mater. 29, 9 (1993).
20. W. N. Sharpe, Jr., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 14, 187 (1966).
21. The fact that the jump distance appears to be determined by the sample thickness suggests motion in three dimensions. We neither expect nor find close quantitative agreement between our 1D theory and experiment in this area. Nevertheless, the instability present in the 1D equations may still be the mechanism behind the hopping fronts. 3D simulations that account for necking are needed to answer this question.
22. K. Chihab, Y. Estrin, L. P. Kubin, and J. Vergnol, Scr. Metall. 21, 203 (1987).
23. P. G. McCormick, S. Venkadesan, and C. P. Ling, Scr. Metall. Mater. 29, 1159 (1993).