Structure and matrix models for tolerance analysis from configuration to detail design

Research in Engineering Design - Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 112-125

  Johannesson, Hans ^a   Söderberg, Rikard ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; CONSTRAINT THEORY; FITS AND TOLERANCES; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER AIDED TOLERANCING TOOLS; GEOMETRY DESIGN; MATRIX MODELS; STRUCTURE MODELS; TOLERANCE ANALYSIS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 0034510759     PISSN: 09349839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001630050027     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chase KW, Parkinson AR (1991) A survey of research in the application of tolerance analysis to the design of mechanical assemblies. Res Eng Design, 3: 23-37
2. El-Haik B, Yang K (1999) Tolerance design - an axiomatic perspective. Proceedings of the ASME Design Automation Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, DETC99/DAC-8706
3. Gao J, Chase KW, Magleby SP (1998) Global coordinate method for determining sensitivity in assembly tolerance analysis. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, November 15-20
4. Johannesson HL (1996) On the nature and consequences of functional couplings in axiomatic machine design. Proceedings of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, August 18-22, Irvine, CA, 96-DETC/DTM-1528
5. Lee DJ, Thornton AC (1996) The identification and use of key characteristics in the product development process. Proceedigns of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, August 18-22, Irvine, CA, DETC96/DTM-1235
6. Lindkvist L, Söderberg R (1999) Concurrent robust product and process design. Proceedings of the ASME Design Automation Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, DETC99/DAC-8687
7. Mantripragada R, Whitney DE (1998) 'The datum flow chain: a systematic approach to assembly design and modeling. Proceedings of the ASME Design for Manufacture Conference, September 13-16, Atlanta, GA, DETC98/DFM-5713
8. NCR Norge A/S (1998) Metis Users' Guide, Version 1.10, Horten, Norway
9. Parkinson A, Chase K, Rogers M (1999) Robust design via tolerance analysis in the conceptual design stage. Proceedings of the ASME Design Automation Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, DETC99/DAC-8577
10. Pimmler TU, Eppinger SD (1994) Integration analysis of product decompositions. Proceedings of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Minneapolis, MN, Book No.H00914, DE-Vol. 68
11. Salomonsen OW, van Houten F, Kals H (1997) Current status of CAT systems", 5th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Toronto, April 28-29, 345-359
12. Söderberg R (1998) Robust design by support of CAT tools. Proceedings of the ASME Design Automation Conference, September 13-16, Atlanta, GA, DETC98/DAC-5633
13. Söderberg R, Carlson J (1999) Locating scheme analysis for robust assembly and fixture design. Proceedings of the ASME Design Automation Conference, September 12-16, Las Vegas, Nevada, DETC99/DAC8690
14. Söderberg R, Johannesson HL (1998) Spatial incompatibility - part interaction and tolerance allocation in configuration design. Proceedings of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, September 13-16, Atlanta, GA, DETC98/DTM-5643
15. Söderberg R, Johannesson HL (1999) Tolerance chain detection by geometrical constraint based coupling analysis. J Eng Design, 10(1)
16. Söderberg R, Lindkvist L (1999a) Computer aided assembly robustness evaluation and geometrical coupling quantification. J Eng Design, 10(2):165-181
17. Suh NP (1990) The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press
18. Thornton AC (1997) Using key characteristics to balance cost and quality during product development. Proceedigns of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, September 14-17, Sacramento, CA, DETC97/DTM-3899
19. Thornton AC (1999) A mathematical framework for the key characteristic process. Res in Eng Design, 11(3):145-157