|
Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 371-376
|
Comparison of three methods of CD34+ cell enumeration in peripheral blood: Dual-platform ISHAGE protocol versus single-platform, versus microvolume fluorimetry
a a a a a a a a |
Author keywords
CD34; Microvolume fluorimetry; Single platform
|
Indexed keywords
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;
CD34 ANTIGEN;
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE;
GRANULOCYTE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR;
ACCURACY;
ANALYZER;
APHERESIS;
ARTICLE;
ASSAY;
BIOLOGICAL THERAPY;
BLOOD CELL COUNT;
CANCER;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL PROTOCOL;
CORRELATION FUNCTION;
CYTOMETRY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN CELL;
LEUKOCYTE COUNT;
METHODOLOGY;
MICROFLUOROMETRY;
PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELL;
QUANTITATIVE ASSAY;
STELLATE CELL;
STEM CELL;
BLOOD;
BLOOD CELL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CYTOLOGY;
FLUOROMETRY;
IMMUNOLOGY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SAMPLE SIZE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STEM CELL MOBILIZATION;
ANTIGENS, CD34;
BLOOD CELL COUNT;
BLOOD CELLS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FLUOROMETRY;
HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL MOBILIZATION;
HUMAN;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SAMPLE SIZE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 0034508994
PISSN: 14653249
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/146532400539279 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (15)
|
References (16)
|