Polarized-neutron scattering study of the cooper-pair moment in Sr2RuO4

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 25, 2000, Pages 5412-5415

  Duffy, J A ^a   Hayden, S M ^a   Maeno, Y ^b,c   Mao, Z ^b,c   Kulda, J ^d   McIntyre, G J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^d INSTITUT LAUE LANGEVIN   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETIZATION; NEUTRON SCATTERING; POLARIZATION; SINGLE CRYSTALS; SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY;

COOPER PAIR MOMENT; FLOATING ZONE METHOD; MAGNETIZATION DENSITY; MIXED STATE; SPIN TRIPLET COOPER PAIRING; SUPERCONDUCTING TRANSITION;

STRONTIUM COMPOUNDS;

EID: 0034506972     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5412     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Y. Maeno et al., Nature (London) 372, 532 (1994).
2. A. P. Mackenzie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3786 (1996).
3. T. M. Rice and M. Sigrist, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 7, 643 (1995).
4. G. Baskaran, Physica (Amsterdam) 223B-224B, 490 (1996).
5. A. P. Mackenzie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 161 (1998).
6. K. Ishida et al., Nature (London) 396, 658 (1998).
7. G. M. Luke et al., Nature (London) 394, 558 (1998).
8. F. Laube et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1595 (2000).
9. S. Nishizaki, Y. Maeno, and Z. Mao, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 572 (2000).
10. K. Ishida et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5387 (2000).
11. M. Sigrist and M. Zhitomirsky, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 3452 (1996).
12. K. Machida, M. Ozaki, and T. Ohmi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 3720 (1996).
13. D. F. Agterberg, T. M. Rice, and M. Sigrist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3374 (1997).
14. Y. Hasegawa, K. Machida, and M. Ozaki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 336 (2000).
15. C. G. Shull and F. A. Wedgwood, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 513 (1966) . See also C. G. Shull and R. P. Ferrier, ibid. 10, 295 (1963); C. G. Shull. ibid. 10, 297 (1963).
16. C. G. Shull and F. A. Wedgwood, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 513 (1966) . See also C. G. Shull and R. P. Ferrier, ibid. 10, 295 (1963); C. G. Shull. ibid. 10, 297 (1963).
17. C. G. Shull and F. A. Wedgwood, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 513 (1966) . See also C. G. Shull and R. P. Ferrier, ibid. 10, 295 (1963); C. G. Shull. ibid. 10, 297 (1963).
18. C. Stassis et al., Phys. Rev. B 34, 4382 (1986).
19. J. X. Boucherie et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 192B, 25 (1993).
20. 4" (to be published).
21. G. L. Squires, Introduction to the Theory of Thermal Neutron Scattering (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1978).
22. P. J. Brown, in International Tables for Crystallography (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992), Vol. C, p. 391.
23. Y. Maeno et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 1405 (1997).
24. K. Yosida, Phys. Rev. 110, 769 (1958).
25. Z. Q. Mao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 991 (2000).
26. normal, where γ is the linear coefficient of the electronic heat capacity.
27. See, e.g., P. W. Anderson, Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics (Benjamin-Cummings, Reading, PA, 1984), p. 327.
28. 3He, a small increase of the spin susceptibility is expected theoretically, and found experimentally. See, respectively, A. J. Leggett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 404 (1975); J. C. Wheatley, ibid. 47, 423 (1975). Such a change appears to be beyond the resolution of the present experiment.
29. 3He, a small increase of the spin susceptibility is expected theoretically, and found experimentally. See, respectively, A. J. Leggett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 404 (1975); J. C. Wheatley, ibid. 47, 423 (1975). Such a change appears to be beyond the resolution of the present experiment.
30. M. Sigrist et al., cond-mat/9902214.
31. V. P. Mineev and K. V. Samokhin, Introduction to Unconventional Superconductivity (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1999), p. 106.
32. H. Tou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1374 (1996).