-
1
-
-
3342899171
-
-
B. L. Altshuler, Yu. Gefen, A. Kamenev, and L. S. Levitov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2803 (1997).
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.78
, pp. 2803
-
-
Altshuler, B.L.1
Gefen, Yu.2
Kamenev, A.3
Levitov, L.S.4
-
5
-
-
0000292151
-
-
C. Mejia-Monasterio, J. Richert, T. Rupp, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5189 (1998).
-
(1998)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.81
, pp. 5189
-
-
Mejia-Monasterio, C.1
Richert, J.2
Rupp, T.3
Weidenmüller, H.A.4
-
11
-
-
0343639781
-
-
Benjamin, New York
-
A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (Benjamin, New York, 1969), Vol. 1, p. 284.
-
(1969)
Nuclear Structure
, vol.1
, pp. 284
-
-
Bohr, A.1
Mottelson, B.R.2
-
12
-
-
85037192180
-
-
We may set (Formula presented) without loss of generality. Under this condition, the relations between parameters become simpler to yield (Formula presented) and (Formula presented), for example
-
We may set (Formula presented) without loss of generality. Under this condition, the relations between parameters become simpler to yield (Formula presented) and (Formula presented), for example.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
85037228594
-
-
We note that within the finite range of (Formula presented) (Formula presented), the functional form of (Formula presented), which was suggested in Ref. 4, does not differ seriously from a power form of (Formula presented)
-
We note that within the finite range of (Formula presented) (Formula presented), the functional form of (Formula presented), which was suggested in Ref. 4, does not differ seriously from a power form of (Formula presented).
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
85037216153
-
-
We may try a more refined analysis through higher cumulants of (Formula presented) assuming that just at the transition point, (Formula presented) will be given by a critical form (Formula presented), which is insensitive to U and j. Unfortunately, such an approach is not successful within our data accuracy
-
We may try a more refined analysis through higher cumulants of (Formula presented) assuming that just at the transition point, (Formula presented) will be given by a critical form (Formula presented), which is insensitive to U and j. Unfortunately, such an approach is not successful within our data accuracy.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
85037248346
-
-
For example, the correlation of the diagonal energies for the layer model decays very slowly with the distance as (Formula presented), where C is a constant of order of (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) is the distance between two Slater determinants or two vertices characterized by i and j respectively. In contrast, it is zero unless (Formula presented) for the Anderson models
-
For example, the correlation of the diagonal energies for the layer model decays very slowly with the distance as (Formula presented), where C is a constant of order of (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) is the distance between two Slater determinants or two vertices characterized by i and j respectively. In contrast, it is zero unless (Formula presented) for the Anderson models.
-
-
-
|