Fractional quantum Hall effect in infinite-layer systems

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 25, 2000, Pages 5408-5411

  Naud, J D ^a   Pryadko, Leonid P ^b   Sondhi, S L ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRON TUNNELING; GROUND STATE; HALL EFFECT; MAGNETIC FIELDS; QUANTUM THEORY; STATISTICAL MECHANICS; SURFACES; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

CHIRAL; EDGE THEORY; FRACTIONAL QUANTUM HALL EFFECT; RENORMALIZATION GROUP; SPIN DYNAMICS; STACKED TWO DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON SYSTEMS; SUM RULE; TRANSVERSE MAGNETIC FIELDS;

ELECTRON GAS;

EID: 0034498291     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5408     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Examples of such work include D. L. Cox and A. Zawadowski, Adv. Phys. 47, 599 (1998); P. W. Anderson, The Theory of Superconductivity in the High-Tc Cuprates (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997); V. J. Emery et al., cond-mat/0001077.
2. Examples of such work include D. L. Cox and A. Zawadowski, Adv. Phys. 47, 599 (1998); P. W. Anderson, The Theory of Superconductivity in the High-Tc Cuprates (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997); V. J. Emery et al., cond-mat/0001077.
3. Examples of such work include D. L. Cox and A. Zawadowski, Adv. Phys. 47, 599 (1998); P. W. Anderson, The Theory of Superconductivity in the High-Tc Cuprates (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997); V. J. Emery et al., cond-mat/0001077.
4. S. M. Girvin and A. H. MacDonald, in Novel Quantum Liquids in Low-Dimensional Semiconductor Structures, edited by S. DasSarma and A. Pinczuk (Wiley, New York, 1995).
5. H. L. Stormer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 85 (1986).
6. J. T. Chalker and A. Dohmen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4496 (1995); L. Balents and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2782 (1996); J. J. Betouras and J. T. Chalker, cond-mat/0005151, and references therein.
7. J. T. Chalker and A. Dohmen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4496 (1995); L. Balents and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2782 (1996); J. J. Betouras and J. T. Chalker, cond-mat/0005151, and references therein.
8. J. T. Chalker and A. Dohmen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4496 (1995); L. Balents and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2782 (1996); J. J. Betouras and J. T. Chalker, cond-mat/0005151, and references therein.
9. D. P. Druist et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 365 (1998).
10. X. Qiu, R. Joynt, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 40, 11 943 (1989); Phys. Rev. B 42, 1339 (1990).
11. X. Qiu, R. Joynt, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 40, 11 943 (1989); Phys. Rev. B 42, 1339 (1990).
12. J. D. Naud, L. P. Pryadko, and S. L. Sondhi, cond-mat/ 0006506 [Nucl. Phys. B (to be published)].
13. In finite stacks with open boundary conditions there are nonuniformities in ν near the end layers; see Ref. [7].
14. X.-G. Wen and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. B 46, 2290 (1992).
15. This is a statement about the surface of the system within the region of validity of the low-energy effective Hamiltonian (6).
16. K. Damle and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 56, 8714 (1997).
17. J. D. Naud, L. P. Pryadko, and S. L. Sondhi, Nucl. Phys. B565, 572 (2000); cond-mat/0006173 [Phys. Rev. B (to be published)].