Early flower bud loss and mepiquat chloride effects on cotton yield distribution

Crop Science

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1678-1684

  Cook, D R ^a   Kennedy, C W ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSCISSION; BUD; BUD LOSS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FRUITING; PHYTOHORMONE; PLANT ANATOMY AND MORPHOLOGY; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT YIELD;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; HIRSUTUM;

EID: 0034497829     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2000.4061678x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Cotton insect control 1999
2. COTMAP, a technique for evaluating structure and yield of cotton plants
3. Cotton response to planting date and mepiquat chloride
4. Effects of mepiquat chloride on cotton in Northeast Louisiana
5. Some effects of continuous removal of floral buds on the growth of the cotton plant
6. Physiology of the cotton plant
7. Partitioning of biomass in well-watered and water-stressed cotton plants treated with mepiquat chloride
8. Evaluation of a feedback vs scheduled approach to PIX applications
9. Causes of square and boll shedding in cotton
10. Abscission of cotton floral buds as influenced by factors affecting photosynthesis and respiration
11. Physiology of PIX®. Physiology Today 2:6
12. Effects of leaf and bract isolines on spray penetration and insecticidal efficacy
13. Effectiveness of fruiting sites in cotton: Yield
14. Computer programs for recording and analyzing cotton fruit location maps
15. Effect of early season square removal on three leaf types of cotton
16. Competition between adjacent fruiting forms in cotton
17. Cotton response to growth regulator
18. Cotton fruiting modification with mepiquat chloride
19. Boll retention and yield as influenced by sequential low dose applications of PIX
20. The uses of Pix
21. Effects of fruiting form removal on cotton reproductive development
22. 2-enriched atmospheres
23. Cotton square shedding. Why they fall; What it means to yields
24. Effect of PIX on cotton fruiting characteristics and yield. V.1
25. A two year summary of applying PIX at variable rates when plant height varies in a cotton field
26. Response of short- and full-season cotton cultivars to mepiquat chloride II. Yield components and fiber properties
27. Management of cotton insects in the southern, eastern, and blackland areas of Texas
28. Midsouth PIX results for 1987 and 1988. V1
29. Influence of boll removal on assimilate partitioning of cotton
30. Mepiquat chloride and irrigation versus cotton growth and development
31. Comparison of insect injurycotton yield response functions and economic injury levels for Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the lower gulf coast of Texas
32. Compensatory growth in cotton after loss of reproductive organs
33. Efficacy of insecticide penetration as a function of canopy architecture
34. Early season development of floral buds in cotton
35. Cotton response to bud and boll removal
36. Effect of single and multiple applications of mepiquat chloride on Mississippi cotton
37. Cotton fruiting patterns as affected by nitrogen rate and Pix-preliminary evaluation with COTMAP
38. Comparative growth of obsolete and modern cotton cultivars. II. Reproductive dry matter partitioning
39. Pix (mepiquat chloride) multiple applications, new label summary
40. Behavior of Pix plant growth regulator on the cotton plant and the environment
41. Uniform travel speed for manually propelled sprayers and spreaders
42. Canopy leaf area development and age dynamics in cotton
43. Response of cotton to mepiquat chloride with varying N rates and plant populations