Adelaide laparoscopic hysterectomy audit (1991-1998): Realistic complication rates!

Gynaecological Endoscopy

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 369-372

  O'Shea, Robert T ^a,b   Petrucco, Oswald ^a   Gordon, Simon ^a   Seman, Elvis ^a  

^a Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists   (Australia)

^b FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cystotomy; Haematoma; Haemorrhage; Labarotomy; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Ureter

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BLEEDING; DIATHERMY; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETER INJURY; URINARY TRACT INJURY;

EID: 0034488372     PISSN: 09621091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2508.2000.00397.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Adelaide laparoscopic hysterectomy audit (1991-1994): Complications in the real world
2. How safe is the laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy?
3. Is total laparoscopic hysterectomy a safe surgical procedure?
4. Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy
5. Laparoscopicassisted vaginal hysterectomy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1995 Membership Survey
6. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States: The collaborative review of sterilization