Taxing or talking: Addressing environmental externalities in the extractive industries

Minerals and Energy - Raw Materials Report

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 33-40

  Humphreys, David ^a  

^a Economics Department   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; MINERAL RESOURCE; TAX SYSTEM;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0034483202     PISSN: 14041049     EISSN: 16512286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14041040009362571     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beckerman, W. (1995). Small is Stupid, Duckworth, London.
2. Bode, T. (1999). The Economist, Letter from Greenpeace International, 11 December.
3. Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission (2000). Promoting Sustainable Development in the EU Non-Energy Extractive Industry, COM(2000) 265 final, 3 May.
4. Confederation of British Industry (1998). Coming Clean: Using Market Instruments to Improve the Environment, March.
5. Cox, A. (1994). “Land Access for Mineral Development in Australia,” in R.G. Eggert (ed.), Mining and the Environment: International Perspectives on Public Policy, Resources for the Future, Washington D.C.
6. Crowson, P.C.F. (1992). Mineral Resources: The Infinitely Finite, ICME.
7. Davis, L.A. (1998). “Mining and the Environment - 25 years on from the Club of Rome,” in Minerals, Land and The Natural Environment: The Foundations of Wealth, Paper presented at a conference organised by the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 24 June.
8. HM Treasury (1997). Financial Statement and Budget Report, July.
9. HM Treasury (2000). Economic and Fiscal Strategy Report and Financial Statement and Budget Report, March.
10. Humphreys, D. (1992). “The Phantom of Full Cost Pricing,” paper presented to a seminar of the International Council of Metals and the Environment, London, 22 October. (A large part of the paper was reproduced in the Mining journal, 12 February, 1993).
11. Humphreys, D. (2000). “A Business Perspective on Community Relations in Mining,” forthcoming in Resources Policy.
12. Imber, D., G. Stevenson and L. Wilks (1991). A Contingent Valuation Survey of the Kakadu Conservation Zone, Resource Assessment Commission Research Paper No. 3, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
13. London Economics (1998). Environmental Costs and Benefits of the Supply of Aggregates, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, April.
14. Metals Economics Group (1993). Environmental Costs and Issues in Gold Exploration, Development, Production, and Reclamation, MEG, Halifax, Nova Scotia, July.
15. Moran, A. (1991). Valuing the Kakadu Conservation Zone: A Critique of the Resource Assessment Commission’s Contingent Valuation Study, Tasman Institute, Occasional Paper No. B8, March.
16. OECD (1989). Economic Instruments for Environmental Protection, Paris.
17. OECD (1991). Environmental Policy: How to Apply Economic Instruments, Paris.
18. OECD (1993). Taxation and the Environment: Complementary Policies, Paris.
19. OECD (1994). Managing the Environment: The Role of Economic Instruments, Paris.
20. OECD (1997a). Evaluating Economic Instruments for Environmental Policy, Paris.
21. OECD (1997b). Full Cost Pricing, Annex 1 Expert Group on the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris.
22. The Quarry Products Association (1998a). Assessment of the London Economics Research Project Carried out for the DETR, April.
23. The Quarry Products Association (1998b). A New Deal from the Aggregates Industry, November.
24. The Quarry Products Association (1999). The New Deal from the Aggregates Industry: A Partnership Proposal for Environmental Improvement, July.
25. Simon, J.L. (1981). The Ultimate Resource, Martin Roberston, Oxford.
26. Sundqvist, T. (2000). Electricity Externality Studies: Do the Numbers Make Sense?, Licentiate thesis, Division of Economics, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden.
27. UN Environment Programme (1999). Global Environment Report, Earthscan, London.