Why biennials are so few: Habitat availability and the species pool

Ecoscience

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 461-465

  Viswanathan, D ^a   Aarssen, L W ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Habitat availability; Plant life history; Species pool

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIENNIAL PLANT; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; LIFE HISTORY; SPECIES POOL;

CANADA; KINGSTON; ONTARIO;

EID: 0034473921     PISSN: 11956860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2000.11682618     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Why are biennials so few? Hart's results revisited
2. Life-history consequences of natural selection: Cole's result revisited
3. The history of weeds in Britain
4. Why are biennials so few?
5. On strict and facultative biennials
6. Why are biennials so maligned?
7. On the origin of the field plants of the Northeastern United States
8. The species pool and its relation to species richness: Evidence from Estonian plant communities
9. A provisional checklist of species for the Flora North America
10. Why are biennials sometimes not so few?
11. Death of the elusive biennial
12. "Biennials": A reply to Kelly
13. On the relationship between r/k selection and environmental carrying capacity: A new templet for plant life history strategies
14. Why biennials are not as few as they ought to be
15. Three competing models for predicting the size of species pools: A test using Eastern North American wetlands