|
Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 247-251
|
Mammographic screening and mammographic patterns
|
Author keywords
Dedifferentiation; Mammographic density; Mammography; Screening sensitivity
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGE;
BIOLOGY;
BREAST CANCER;
BREAST CARCINOGENESIS;
CANCER MORTALITY;
CANCER PREVENTION;
CANCER RISK;
CANCER SCREENING;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DENSITY;
DIFFERENTIATION;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
NOTE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS;
BREAST DENSITY;
CANCER DIAGNOSIS;
CANCER PROGNOSIS;
CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS;
CLINICAL FEATURE;
IMAGE QUALITY;
MAMMOGRAPHIC PATTERN;
ADIPOSE TISSUE;
ADULT;
AGE FACTORS;
AGED;
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS, HORMONAL;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST;
CELL DIFFERENTIATION;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
DISEASE PROGRESSION;
EPITHELIAL CELLS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
MASS SCREENING;
MIDDLE AGED;
PROGNOSIS;
RANDOM ALLOCATION;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
RISK;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STROMAL CELLS;
SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;
SWEDEN;
TAMOXIFEN;
|
EID: 0034469048
PISSN: 14655411
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1186/bcr64 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (23)
|
References (20)
|