Variability in Daily Ration Estimates of Age-0 Striped Bass in the Chesapeake Bay

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 129, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 1181-1186

  Hartman, K J ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOENERGETICS; DIEL VARIATION; FOOD INTAKE; GROWTH RATE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034458270     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<1181:VIDREO>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brandt, S. B., and K. J. Hartman. 1993. Innovative approaches with bioenergetics models: future applications to fish ecology and management. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122:731-735.
2. Cui, Y., and R. J. Wootton. 1988. Effects of ration, temperature, and body size on the body composition, energy content and condition of the minnow, Phoxinusphoxinus (L.). Journal of Fish Biology 32: 749-764.
3. Cummins, K. W., and J. C. Wuycheck. 1971. Caloric equivalents for investigations in ecological energetics. Mitteilungen der Internationalen Vereini-gung fur theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 18.
4. Eggers, D. M. 1977. Factors in interpreting data obtained by diel sampling offish stomachs. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34:290-294.
5. Hansen, M. J., D. Boisclair, S. B. Brandt, S. W. Hewett, J. F Kitchell, M. C. Lucas, and J. J. Ney. 1993. Applications of bioenergetics models to fish ecology and management: where do we go from here? Transactions ofthe American Fisheries Society 122: 1019-1030.
6. Hartman, K. J., and S. B. Brandt. 1995a. Predatory demand and impact of striped bass, bluefish and weak-fish in the Chesapeake Bay: applications of bioenergetics models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:1667-1687.
7. Hartman, K. J., and S. B. Brandt. 1995b. Comparative energetics and the development of bioenergetics models for sympatric estuarine piscivores. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:1647-1666.
8. Hartman, K. J., and S. B. Brandt. 1995c. Estimating energy density offish. Transactions ofthe American Fisheries Society 124:347-355.
9. Hartman, K. J., and S. B. Brandt. 1995d. Trophic resource partitioning, diets, and growth of sympatric estuarine predators. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:520-537.
10. Hewett, S. W., and B. L. Johnson. 1992. A generalized bioenergetics model of fish growth for microcomputers, version 2.0. University of Wisconsin, Sea Grant Institute, Madison.
11. Jearld, A., Jr. 1983. Age determination. Pages 301-324 in L. A. Nielsen and D. L. Johnson, editors. Fisheries techniques. American Fisheries Society, Be-thesda, Maryland.
12. Krebs, C. J. 1994. Ecological methodology. Pages 230-232 in Benjamin/Cummings Publishers, Menlo Park, California.
13. Maryland Department of Natural Resources. 1989. Investigation of striped bass in Chesapeake Bay 1988-1989. Annual progress report. USFWS federal aid project F-42-R-2. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis.
14. Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Council. 1997. Striped bass fishery management plan. Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Washington, D.C.
15. National Fishery Research Center. 1989. Striped bass research plan. Special report. National Fishery Research Center, Leetown, West Virginia.
16. Post, J. R. 1990. Metabolic allometry of larval and juvenile yellow perch (Perca flavescens): in situ estimates of bioenergetics models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:554-560.
17. Smagula, C. M., and I. A. Adelman. 1982. Day-to-day variation in food consumption by largemouth bass. Transactions ofthe American Fisheries Society 111: 543-548.
18. Tackett, D. L., R. R. Carter, and K. O. Allen. 1988. Daily variation in feed consumption by channel catfish. Progressive Fish-Culturist 50:107-110.