Manufacturing specialization in the Southeast: Rural necessity, rural possibility, or rural vestige?

Review of Regional Studies

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 167-187

  Wojan, T R ^a   Lackey, S B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MANUFACTURING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RURAL ECONOMY; SPECIALIZATION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034453970     PISSN: 0048749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rural industrial development: To cluster or not to cluster?
2. The marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion
3. Testing for employer monopsony in turn-of-the-century coal mining
4. Sources of cyclical instability in rural counties
5. Small firms and the provision of real services
6. The revised ERS county typology: An overview
7. Plant-level scale economies and industrial concentration
8. Directions for diversification with an application to saskatchewan
9. Industry clusters in the TVA region: Do they affect development of rural areas?
10. A new micro view of the U.S. rural economy
11. Monopsony and plant location in a thunen land use model
12. Transportation costs, the new economic geography, and rural development
13. Industrial districts in West Jutland, Denmark
14. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization
15. Work, labour and action: Work experience in a system of flexible production
16. Increasing returns and long-run growth
17. Industrial districts: Model and reality in baden-Württemberg, Germany
18. The quantitative importance of marshallian industrial districts in the italian economy
19. Industrial Diversification in nonmetropolitan counties and its effect on economic stability
20. Location and theory of production under monopsony