Optimal lifting techniques adopted by Chinese men when determining their maximum acceptable weight of lift

American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 642-648

  Chen, Y L ^a  

^a MING CHI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Acceleration effect; Lifting technique; MAWL; Posture; Upper extremity weakness

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; CHINESE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE; TECHNIQUE; WEIGHT LIFTING;

EID: 0034451229     PISSN: 15298663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15298660008984573     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational weight lifting factors
2. Epidemiological aspects on low-back pain in industry
3. Comparison of United States (NIOSH lifting guidelines) and European (ECSC force limits) recommendations for manual work limits
4. Proposed manual handling International and European Standard
5. The design of school furniture for Hong Kong schoolchildren: An anthropometric case study
6. The relationship between isometric strength of Cantonese males and the U.S. NIOSH guide for manual lifting
7. Functional assessment for prediction of lifting capacity
8. The study of the problem of manual materials handling
9. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects
10. Psychophysical modelling of lifting capacity of Chinese males using strength variables
11. Maximum acceptable weight of lift by Chinese experienced male manual handlers
12. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects
13. The validity of the revised NIOSH weight limit in a Korean young male population: A psychophysical approach
14. Three different lifting strategies for controlling the motion patterns of the external load
15. Relationship between moments at the L5/S1 level, hip and knee joint when lifting
16. The effect of quadriceps fatigue on the technique of lifting
17. The design of manual handling tasks
18. A biomechanical model of the lumbosacral joint during lifting activities
19. Dynamically and statically determined low back moments during lifting
20. A non-invasive protocol for the determination of lumbosacral vertebral angle
21. Comparison of static and dynamic biomechanical models
22. Moment arms of spinal musculature determined from CT scans
23. The design of manual handling tasks: Revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces
24. Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate
25. Biomechanical stresses from manual load lifting: A static vs dynamic evaluation
26. Movements of the thoracic and lumbar spine when lifting: A chrono-cyclophotographic study
27. Efficiency and effectiveness of stoop and squat lifting at different frequencies
28. The physiological cost of three different methods of lifting in sagittal and lateral planes
29. Ratings of perceived thigh and back exertion in forest workers during repetitive lifting using squat and stoop techniques
30. Biomechanical exploration on dynamic modes of lifting
31. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities
32. Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back