On-line looming: A quality experience

New Review of Information Networking

Volumn 6, Issue , 2000, Pages 81-102

  Gunn, Cathy ^a   Barnett, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULA; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; ONLINE SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

FLEXIBLE LEARNING; ONLINE EDUCATION; ONLINE LEARNING;

DISTANCE EDUCATION;

EID: 0034447852     PISSN: 13614576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13614570009516954     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. McKENZIE, J. The ties that bind and the links that set us free. From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal, July 2000. http://fno.org/sumOO/links.hlml
2. BRUNER, J. S. Beyond the information given. Contemporary approaches to cognition. Gruber étal. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press: 1957,41-42,50,62-67.
3. BERRYMAN, S. Designing effective learning environments: cognitive apprenticeship models, Institute on Education and the Economy, Columbia University Teachers' College. 2000.
4. SPIRO, R. J., P. J. FELTOVICH, et al. Cognitive flexibility theory: random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology: May, 1991.
5. BARNETT, J and HODSON, D. (In press) Pedagogical context knowledge: towards a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education.
6. HONEBEIN, P. C., T. M. DUFFY, et al. Constructivism and the design of learning environments. Context and authentic activities for learning. In: Designing environments for constructive learning. T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck and D. Jonassen. Heidelberg, Springer Verlag. 1993.;
7. GRABINGER, S. and J. DUNLAP. Rich environments for active learning : a definition. ALT-J 3(2): 1995, 5-34.;
8. REIBEL, J. The Institute for Learning Technologies: pedagogy for the 21st century. Institute for Learning Technologies. 1994. http://www.ilt.colurnbiaedu/ilt/papers/iLpedagogy.html#5.
9. BRUNER, op.cit.
10. TOULMIN, S. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1958.;
11. TOULMIN, S., R. RIEKE, et al. An introduction to reasoning, 2nd ed. New York: Macraillan, 1978.
12. KÜHN, T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.,1962.
13. HUDSON, D. A personal communication. University of Toronto. February, 1993.
14. GRUNDY.S. Curriculum: product or praxis. London: The Palmer Press. 1987.
15. HABERMAS, J. Knowledge and human interests. (J.J. Shapiro Trans.). Boston: Beacon. 1971.
16. SCHON, D. The reflective practitioner. New York, Basic Books. 1983.
17. CONNELLY, P.M. and CLANDININ, D.J. Teachers as curriculum planners: narratives of experience. Toronto & New York: OISE Press and Teachers College Press. 1988.
18. BARNETT, J and HUDSON, D. op. cit.
19. KELLY, O.A. The psychology of persona! constructs. New York, Norton. 1955.
20. CARR, W. AND S. KEMMIS Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. London & Philadelphia: The Palmer Press, 1986.
21. CARNESON, J, G DELPIERRE, et al.. Designing and managing multiple choice questions, 2000. http://www.uct.ac.za/proiects/cbe/mcqman/mcqman01 .html
22. CHIOU, G. F. Situated learning, metaphors and computer based learning environments. Educational Technology, (August) 1992,7-11.
23. STEINBERG, E. Cognition and learner control: a literature review 1977-88. Journal of Computer Based Instruction Y6"(4): 1989,117-121.
24. HOPKINS, C. Web + QMark + Humanities = ? Computers & Texts, 16/17(Winter), 1998. http://info.ox.ac.uk/ctilext/publish/comtxt/ctl6-17/hopkins.html