Science and Technology Policy: Is Disability a Missing Factor?

Assistive Technology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 144-153

  Seelman, Katherine D ^a  

^a Department of Health and Human Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BUDGET; DISABILITY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; GOVERNMENT; POLICY; REHABILITATION; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUPPORT; SELF-HELP DEVICES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034442827     PISSN: 10400435     EISSN: 19493614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2000.10132020     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2000). AAAS report XXV: Research and development FY 2001. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Brandt, E. N. & Pope, A. M. (Eds.). (1997). Enabling America: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). Healthy people 2010. Atlanta, GA: Author.
4. Institute of Medicine. (1991). Disability in America: A national agenda for prevention. A. M. Pope & A. R. Tarlov (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Koizumi, K., Teich) A. H., Nelson, S. D., & Carney, J. P. (1999). Congressional action on research and development in the FY 2000 budget. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
6. Meeks, R. L. (1999). President's FY 2000 budget includes reduced R&D request; Nondefense R&D funding catches up to defense R&D (NSF Data Brief No. 99-353). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
7. National Academy of Sciences. (1995). Allocating federal funds for science and technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. National Academy of Sciences. (2000). Observations on the President's fiscal year 2001 federal science and technology budget. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. National Center for Health Statistics. (1997). Trends and differentia] use of assistive technology devices: United States, 1994. Advance data, 292. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.
10. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. (1999). National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research: Long range plan 1999-2003. 64 Federal Registry 68575 (December 7, 1999).
11. National Institute of Handicapped Research, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Education. (1983). 1983 Annual Report Interagency Committee on Handicapped Research. Washington, DC: Author.
12. Payson, S. (1999). National patterns of R&D resources: 1998. NSF 99-335. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
13. Peterson, W. (1998). Public policy affecting universal design. Assistive Technology\ 10, 13-20.
14. President's Information Technology Advisory Committee. (1999). Information technology research: Investing in our future. Washington, DC: Author.
15. Reswick, J. B. (1996, February). Historical perspective of rehabilitation science and engineering. Presented at the meeting of the Institute of Medicine. Committee on Assessing Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Washington, DC.
16. Seelman, K. D. (2000). IT R&D: Incorporating accessibility for people with disabilities. Presented at the meeting of the President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee, Washington, DC.
17. Wagner, C. S., & Yezril, A. (1999). Global science and technology information: A new spin on access. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
18. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. (1993). Technology for America's economic growth: A new direction to build economic strength. Washington, DC: Author.
19. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. (1997). Science and technology shaping the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Author.
20. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2000, February). R&D budget, Dr. Neal Lane's remarks. Washington, DC: Author.
21. World Health Organization. (1999, July). International classification of functioning and disability; beta-2 draft. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
22. You’re not getting older: Products are getting better. (1999, June 26). The New York Times, Section 4, p. 1.