메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 195-201

Is Clinical Pathology Accreditation worth it? A survey of CPAaccredited laboratories

Author keywords

Central government; Defence; Professionalism; Public relations; Sociology; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL LABORATORY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL; MANAGER; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SERVICE; PATHOLOGY; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SAFETY; UNITED KINGDOM; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HOSPITAL LABORATORY; HUMAN; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

EID: 0034438421     PISSN: 14664100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14664100010361746     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (18)

References (3)
  • 1
    • 0025105257 scopus 로고
    • Royal College of Pathologists’ United Kingdom pilot study of laboratory accreditation
    • Audit Steering Committee (1990), “Royal College of Pathologists’ United Kingdom pilot study of laboratory accreditation”, J Clin Pathol, No. 43, pp. 89-91.
    • (1990) J Clin Pathol , Issue.43 , pp. 89-91
  • 2
    • 0031982248 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Raising standards in pathology: the accreditation process in the United Kingdom
    • Haeney, M.R. and Blair, C. (1998), “Raising standards in pathology: the accreditation process in the United Kingdom”, J. Qual. Clin. Practice, No. 18, pp. 75-82.
    • (1998) J. Qual. Clin. Practice , Issue.18 , pp. 75-82
    • Haeney, M.R.1    Blair, C.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.