메뉴 건너뛰기
Imaging
Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 262-265
What gets a radiologist sued?
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; LAW; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NEGLIGENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; RISK MANAGEMENT; SKILL; TRAINING; UNITED KINGDOM;
EID: 0034436929     PISSN: 09656812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/img.12.4.120262     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (1)
References (10)
  • 1
    • 85037407786 scopus 로고
    • Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118, 1 WLR 582
    • (1957)
  • 2
    • 85037418628 scopus 로고
    • Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority 13 BMLR 111.
    • (1992)
  • 3
    • 85037419437 scopus 로고
    • Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation 2 All ER 680.
    • (1947)
  • 4
    • 85037404874 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Joyce v Wandsworth Health Authority 7 Medical Law Review 1.
    • (1996)
  • 5
    • 85037410131 scopus 로고
    • Nettleship v Weston 2 QB 691.
    • (1971)
  • 6
    • 85037405724 scopus 로고
    • Wilsher v Essex Health Authority 1 All ER 871.
    • (1988)
  • 7
    • 85037410669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Professional Insurers Association of America/American College of Radiology "Practice Standards Claim Survey" [February]
    • (1997)
  • 8
    • 85037419271 scopus 로고
    • Holmes v Board of Hospital Trustees of the City of London 81 DLR 3d 67 (Ont HC).
    • (1977)
  • 9
    • 85037414240 scopus 로고
    • Thomsen v Davison Qd R 93.
    • (1975)
  • 10
    • 85037412104 scopus 로고
    • Fredete v Wicke 29 DLR (4th) 534.
    • (1986)

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.