CES production functions and economic growth

Scandinavian Journal of Economics

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 41-56

  Klump, Rainer ^a   Preissler, Harald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

CES production functions; Convergence; Endogenous growth; Neoclassical growth

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034423774     PISSN: 03470520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9442.00183     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arrow, K. J., Chenery, H. B., Minhas, B. S. and Solow, R. M. (1961), Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency, Review of Economics and Statistics 43, 225-250.
2. Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995), Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill, New York.
3. Brock, W. A. and Malliaris, A. G. (1989), Differential Equations, Stability and Chaos in Dynamic Economics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
4. Brown, M. and de Carni, J. S. (1963), Technological Change and the Distribution of Income, International Economic Review 3, 289-309.
5. Cronin, F. J., Colleran, E. and Gold, M. (1997), Telecommunications, Factor Substitution and Economic Growth, Contemporary Economic Policy 15, 21-31.
6. David, P. A. and van de Klundert, T. (1965), Biased Efficiency Growth and Capital-Labor Substitution in the U.S., 1899-1960, American Economic Review 55, 357-394.
7. de La Grandville, O. (1989), In Quest of the Slutzky Diamond, American Economic Review 79, 468-481.
8. Harbrecht, W. (1975), Substitutionselastizität und Gleichgewichtswachstum, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 189, 190-201.
9. nd ed., Macmillan, London.
10. Jensen, B. S. and Wang, C. (1997), General Equilibrium Dynamics of Basic Trade Models for Growing Economies, in B. S. Jensen and K. Wong (eds.), Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 77-126.
11. Jones, R. W. (1965), The Structure of Simple General Equilibrium Models, Journal of Political Economy 73, 557-572.
12. Klump, R. (1997), Elasticity of Substitution and Economic Growth: A Note on the de La Grandville Hypothesis, Working Paper, Department of Economic Policy, University of Ulm.
13. Maki, D. R. and Meredith, L. N. (1987), A Note on Unionization and the Elasticity of Substitution, Canadian Journal of Economics 20, 792-801.
14. Pitchford, J. D. (1960), Growth and the Elasticity of Substitution, Economic Record 36, 491-503.
15. Ramanathan, R. (1975), The Elasticity of Substitution and the Speed of Convergence in Growth Models, Economic Journal 85, 612-615.
16. Rebelo, S. (1991), Long-run Policy Analysis and Long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy 99, 500-521.
17. Romer, P. M. (1986), Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth, Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002-1037.
18. Sato, R. (1987), CES Production Function, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds.), The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 1, Macmillan, London 395-396.
19. Solow, R. (1956), A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, 65-94.
20. Ventura, J. (1997). Growth and Interdependence, Quarterly Journal of Economics 62, 57-84.
21. Weder, M. and Grubel, H. G. (1993), The New Growth Theory and Cosean Economics: Institutions to Capture Externalities, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 129, 488-513.
22. Yuhn, K. (1991) Economic Growth, Technical Change Biases, and the Elasticity of Subsritution: A Test of the de La Grandville-Hypothesis, Review of Economics and Statistics 73, 340-346.