57 Varieties: Has the ombudsman concept become diluted?

Negotiation Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 49-57

  Stieber, Carolyn ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a Univ and Coll Ombudsman Assoc   (United States)

^b SPIDR   (United States)

^c International Ombudsman Institute   (Canada)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034421928     PISSN: 07484526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00202.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Elwood, B. 1996. How to harmonise general ombudsman activities with those related to specialized ombudsmen. Discussion paper. International Ombudsman's Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 21 October 1996.
2. Gellhorn, W. 1966a. Ombudsmen and others: Citizens' protectors in nine countries. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
3. _. 1966b. When Americans complain. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
4. Hill, L. B. 1982. The citizen participation-representation roles of American ombudsmen. Administration & Society 13(4): 405-433.
5. _. 1983. The self-perceptions of ombudsmen: A comparative survey. International bandbook of the ombudsman: Evolution and present function, edited by G. Caiden. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
6. Rowat, D., 1961. Ombudsman for North America. Public Administration Review XXIV (December).