Effects of reduced government deficiency payments on post-harvest wheat marketing strategies

Journal of Futures Markets

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 243-263

  Adam, Brian D ^a   Betts, Steven ^a   Brorsen, B Wade ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034421827     PISSN: 02707314     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9934(200003)20:3<243::aid-fut3>3.0.co;2-f     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, K. (1991). Marketing government program wheat. OSU Extension Facts No. 520, Oklahoma State University Cooperative Extension Service.
2. Anderson, K., & Adam, B. D. (1991). Cash marketing wheat. OSU Extension Facts No. 516, Oklahoma State University Cooperative Extension Service.
3. Anderson, K., & Sahs, R. (1999). Basis tables. Working paper, Oklahoma State University Cooperative Extension Service.
4. Anderson, K. B., & Noyes, R. T. (1989). Grain storage costs in Oklahoma. OSU Extension Facts No. 210, Oklahoma State University Cooperative Extension Service.
5. Arias, J. (1995). A dynamic optimal hedging model under price, basis, production and financial risk. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
6. Betts, S. P. Effects of reduced government deficiency payments on post-harvest marketing strategies. (1996). Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Oklahoma State University.
7. Cox, J. C., & Rubinstein, M. (1985). Options Markets. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
8. Crain, S. J., & Lee, J. H. (1996) Volatility in wheat spot and futures market, 1950-1993: Government farm programs, seasonality, and causality. The Journal of Finance, 51, 325-343.
9. Gardner, B. L. (1977). Commodity options for agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59, 986-992.
10. Irwin, S. H., Peck, A. E., Doering III, O. C., & Brorsen, B. W. (1988). A simulation analysis of commodity options as a policy alternative. Options, futures, and agricultural commodity programs: Symposium proceedings (pp. 60-71). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, ERS, February.
11. Kang, T., & Brorsen, B. W. (1995). Valuing target price support programs with average option pricing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 106-118.
12. Mapp, J. N. (1989). Simulation and systems modeling. In Tweeten, L. (Ed.), Agricultural policy analysis tools for economic development, Boulder: Westview Press.
13. Mathews K. H., & Holthausen, D. M. (1991). A simple multiperiod minimum risk hedge model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 1020-1026.
14. Naylor, T. H., Balintfy, J. L., Burdick, D. S., & Chu, K. (1966). Computer simulation techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15. Raskin, R., & Cochran, M. J. (1986). Interpretations and transformations of scale for the Pratt-Arrow absolute risk aversion coefficient: Implications for generalized stochastic dominance. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 11, 204-210.
16. Robison, E. J., & Barry, P. J. The competitive firm's response to risk, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
17. SHAZAM User's Reference Manual, Version 7.0, 1993.
18. Technical Tools. Electronic data. Los Altos, California.
19. Tirupattur, V., & Hauser, R. J. (1994). Valuation of U.S. agricultural support programs: A contingent claims analysis approach. In Brorsen, B. W. (Ed.), NCR-134 Conference: Applied commodity price analysis, forecasting, and market risk management, Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.
20. Turvey, C. G., & Baker, T. G. (1990). A farm-level financial analysis of farmers' use of futures and options under alternative farm programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, 946-957.
21. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices, National Agricultural Statistics Service/Agricultural Statistics Board, 1974-1993 issues.