Collaborative policy making and administration: The operational demands of local economic development

Economic Development Quarterly

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 276-291

  McGuire, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034415730     PISSN: 08912424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (1998a). A jurisdiction-based model of intergovernmental management in U.S. cities. Publias: the Journal of Federalism, 28, 1-20.
2. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (1998b). Multinetwork management: Collaboration and the hollow state in local economic policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 67-91.
3. Bartik, T. J. (1989). Small business start-ups in the United States: Estimates of the effects of the characteristics of states. Southern Economic Journal, 55, 1004-1018.
4. Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies ? Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute of Employment Research.
5. Blakely, E. J. (1994). Planning local economic development (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Bowman, A. O'M. (1988). Competition for economic development among southeastern cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly,25, 511-527.
7. Cable, G., Feiock, R. C., & Kim, J. (1993). The consequences of institutionalized access for economic development policy making in U.S. cities. Economic Development Quarterly, 7, 91-97.
8. Clarke, S. E. (1998). Economic development roles in American cities: A contextual analysis of shifting partnership arrangements. In N. Walzer & B. D. Jacobs (Eds.), Public-private partnerships for local economic development (pp. 19-45). Westport, CT: Praeger.
9. Clarke, S. E., & Gaile, G. L. (1989). Moving toward entrepreneurial economic development policies: Opportunities and barriers. Policy Studies Journal, 17, 574-598.
10. Clarke, S. E., & Gaile, G. L. (1992). The next wave: Postfederal local economic development strategies. Economic Development Quarterly, 6, 187-198.
11. Clingermayer, J. C., & Feiock, R. C. (1990). The adoption of economic development policies by large cities: A test of economic, interest group, and institutional explanations. Policy Studies Journal, 18, 539-552.
12. Eisinger, P. K. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13. Eisinger, P. K. (1995). State economic development in the 1990s: Politics and policy learning. Economic Development Quarterly, 9, 146-158.
14. Fleischmann, A., Green, G. P., & Kwong, T. M. (1992). What's a city to do? Explaining differences in local economic development policies. Western Political Quarterly, 45, 677-699.
15. Fosler, R. S. (1992). State economic policy: The emerging paradigm. Economic Development Quarterly, 6, 3-13.
16. Gross, E. P., & Phillips, J. M. (1997). The effect of economic development agency spending on state income and employment growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 88-96.
17. Hanson, R. L., & Berkman, M. B. (1991). Gauging the rainmakers: Toward a meteorology of state legislative climates. Economic Development Quarterly, 5, 213-228.
18. Harrison, B., & Weiss, M. (1998). Workforce development networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Hjem, B., & Hull, C. J. (1985). Small firm employment creation: An assistance structure explanation. In K. Hanf & T.A.J. Toonen (Eds.), Policy implementation in federal and unitary systems (pp. 131-156). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
20. Hull, C. J. (with Hjern, B.). (1987). Helping small firms grow: An implementation approach. London: Croom Helm. International City/County Management Association. (1994). Economic development 1994 survey. Washington, DC: Author.
21. Kettl, D. F. (1996). Governing at the millennium. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (2nd ed., pp. 5-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Leicht, K. T., & Jenkins, J. C. (1994). Three strategies of state economic development: Entrepreneurial, industrial recruitment, and deregulation policies in the American states. Economic Development Quarterly, 8, 256-269.
23. Levy, J. (1990). What economic developers actually do: Location quotients versus press releases. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56, 153-160.
24. Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 35-58.
25. Luke, J. S., Ventriss, C., Reed, B. J., & Reed, C. M. (1988). Managing economic development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Marlin, M. R. (1990). The effectiveness of economic development subsidies. Economic Development Quarterly, 4, 15-22.
27. May, P. J. (1993). Mandate design and implementation: Enhancing implementation efforts and shaping regulatory styles. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12, 634-663.
28. McGuire, M. (1999). The "more means more" assumption: Congruence vs. contingency in local economic development research. Economic Development Quarterly, 13, 157-171.
29. McGuire, M., Rubin, B., Agranoff, R., & Richards, C. (1994). Building development capacity in nonmetropolitan communities. Public Administration Review, 54, 426-433.
30. Meier, K. J., & Keiser, L. R. (1996). Public administration as a science of the artificial: A methodology for prescription. Public Administration Review, 56, 459-466.
31. O'Toole, L. J. (1996). Hollowing the infrastructure: Revolving loan programs and network dynamics in the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 225-242.
32. O'Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 45-52.
33. Pelissero, J. P., & Fasenfest, D. (1989). A typology of suburban economic development policy orientation. Economic Development Quarterly, 3, 301-311.
34. Reese, L. A. (1993). Categories of local economic development techniques: An empirical analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 21, 492-506.
35. Reese, L. A. (1997). Local economic development policy. New York: Garland.
36. Renner, T. (1989). Trends and issues in the use of intergovernmental agreements and privatization in local government. Baseline Data Reports, 21.
37. Ross, D., & Friedman, R. E. (1991). The emerging third wave: New economic development strategies. In R. S. Fosler (Ed.), Local economic development: Strategies for a changing economy (pp. 125-137). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
38. Rubin, H. J. (1986). Local economic development organizations and the activities of small cities in encouraging economic growth. Policy Studies Journal, 14, 363-388.
39. Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Sharp, E. B. (1991). Institutional manifestations of accessibility and urban economic development policy. Western Political Quarterly, 44, 129-147.
41. Sharp, E. B., & Elkins, D. R. (1991). The politics of economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 5, 126-139.
42. Sternberg, E. (1987). A practitioner's classification of economic development policy instruments, with some inspiration from political economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 1, 149-161.
43. Teitz, M. (1994). Changes in economic development theory and practice. International Regional Science Review, 16, 101-106.
44. Walzer, N., & Jacobs, B. D. (Eds.). (1998). Public-private partnerships for local economic development. Westport, CT: Praeger.
45. Wolman, H. (with Spitzley, D.). (1996). The politics of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 115-150.