The analysis of consumer demand in greece. Model selection and dynamic specification

Economic Modelling

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 455-471

  Tridimas, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Almost ideal demand model; Consumer demand in Greece; Dynamic structure of demand systems; Non nested hypotheses; Rotterdam model; Structural stability

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034410269     PISSN: 02649993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0264-9993(99)00033-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, G., Blundell, R., 1982. Estimation and hypothesis testing in dynamic singular equation systems. Econometrica 50, 1559-1571.
2. Anderson, G., Blundell, R., 1983. Testing restrictions in a flexible dynamic demand system: An application to consumer demand in canada. Rev. Econ. Stud. 50, 397-410.
3. Anderson, G., Blundell, R., 1984. Consumer non-durables in the UK: A dynamic demand system. Econ. J. Suppl. 94, 35-44.
4. Barten, A.P., 1969. Maximum likelihood estimation of complete systems of demand equations. Eur. Econ. Rev. 1, 7-73.
5. Blundell, R., 1988. Consumer behaviour: Theory and empirical evidence - A survey Econ. J. 98, 16-65.
6. Chambers, M.J., 1994. Forecasting with demand systems. A comparative study. J. Econom. 44, 363-376.
7. Courakis, A.S., Tridimas, G., 1993. Public consumption expenditures and private consumer demand. University of Reading, Department of Economics, Discussion Paper 279.
8. Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J.G., 1981. Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica 49, 781-793.
9. Deaton, A.S., 1974. The analysis of consumer demand in the United Kingdom 1900-1970. Econometrica 42, 341-367.
10. Deaton, A.S., 1978. Specification and testing in applied demand analysis. Econ. J. 88, 524-536.
11. Deaton, A.S., Muellbauer, J., 1980. An almost ideal demand system. Am. Econ. Rev. 70, 312-326.
12. Gamaletsos, T., 1973. Further analysis of cross-country comparison of consumer expenditure patterns. Eur. Econ. Rev. 4, 1-20.
13. Goldberger, A.S., Gamaletsos, T., 1970. A cross-country comparison of consumer expenditure patterns. Eur. Econ. Rev. 1, 357-400.
14. Lee, J.-Y., Brown, M.G., Seale Jr., J.L., 1994. Model choice in consumer analysis: Taiwan, 1970-89. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 76, 504-512.
15. Mergos, G.J., Donatos, G.S., 1989. Consumer behaviour in Greece: An application of the almost ideal demand system. Appl. Econ. 21, 983-993.
16. Pesaran, M.H., Deaton, A.S., 1978. Testing non-nested non-linear regression models. Econometrica 46, 677-694.
17. Pollak, R.A., Wales, T.J., 1969. Estimation of the linear expenditure system. Econometrica 37, 611-628.
18. Pollak, R.A., Wales, T.J., 1992. Specification and estimation of dynamic demand systems. In: Phlipps, L., Taylor, L.D. (Eds.), Aggregation, Consumption and Trade. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 99-119.
19. Pudney, S.E., 1981. An empirical method of approximating the separable structure of consumer preferences. Rev. Econ. Stud. 48, 561-577.
20. Theil, H., 1965. The information approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 33, 67-87.
21. Theil, H., 1975. Theory and Measurement of Consumer Demand Analysis. Amsterdam, North-Holland.