Social identification in a computer-mediated group for women in science and engineering

Science Communication

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 344-366

  Kleinman, Sharon S ^a  

^a FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034406090     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547000021004002     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alper, J. 1993. The pipeline is leaking women along the way. Science 260:409-11.
2. American Association of University Women. 1992. How schools shortchange girls: Major findings on girls and education. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
3. Babbie, E. 1995. The practice of social research 7th ed. New York: Wadsworth.
4. Braithwaite, D. O., V. R. Waldron, and J. Finn. 1999. Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication 11 (2): 123-151.
5. Coover, G. E., and L. C. Godbold. 1998. Convergence between racial and political identities: Boundary erasure or aversive racism. Communication Research 25 (6): 669-88.
6. Dollar, N. J., and B. G. Zimmers. 1998. Social identity and communicative boundaries: An analysis of youth and young adult street speakers in a U.S. American community. Communication Research 25 (6): 596-617.
7. Fehrs, M., and R. Czujko. 1992. Women in physics: Reversing the exclusion. Physics Today 8:33-40.
8. Hogg, M. A., and D. Abrams. 1988. Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
9. Kilker, J. 1999. Collaborative design: Communicating identity and resolving disputes in discussions about communication technologies. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA, 27-31 May.
10. Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Lea, M., and R. Spears. 1992. Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing 2:321-41.
12. National Science Foundation. 1994. Women, minorities and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. NSF 94-333. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
13. Scheerhorn, D., J. Warisse, and K. S. McNeilis. 1995. Computer-based telecommunication among an illness-related community: Design, delivery, early use, and the functions of HIGHnet. Health Communication 7 (4): 301-25.
14. Sherif, M. 1966. In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
15. Tajfel, H. 1981. Human groups and social categories. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Turner, J. C. 1981. The experimental social psychology of intergroup behavior. In Intergroup Behavior, edited by J. C. Turner and H. Giles, 66-101. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. Walther, J. B. 1997. Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research 23 (3): 342-69.
18. Welch Cline, R. J. 1998. Communication in social support groups. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, New York City, 20-24 November.
19. Widnall, S. E. 1988. AAAS presidential lecture: Voices from the pipeline. Science 241:1740-745.
20. Winter, D., and C. Huff. 1996. Adapting the Internet: Comments from a women-only electronic forum. American Sociologist 27 (1): 30-54.