Verbs and verb phrases as instructional stimuli in the control of stimulus-equivalence effects

Psychological Record

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 173-187

  Rosales Ruiz, Jesus ^a   Eikeseth, Svein ^b   Duarte, Angela ^c   Baer, Donald M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b Akershus Colege   (Norway)

^c South Shore Mental Health   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034405545     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395349     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. DUARTE, A., EIKESETH, S., ROSALES-RUIZ, J., & BAER, D. M. (1998). The effects of a CAN'T-ANSWER response option and instructions on stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 631-646.
2. DUGDALE, N., & LOWE, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 115-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. EIKESETH, S., & BAER, D. M. (1997). Use of a pre-existing verbal relation to prevent the properties of stimulus equivalence from emerging in new relations. In D. M. Baer & E. M. Pinkston (Eds.), Environment and behavior (pp. 138-144). Boulder: Westview Press.
4. EIKESETH, S., ROSALES-RUIZ, J., DUARTE, A., & BAER, D. M. (1997). The quick development of equivalence classes in a paper-and-pencil format through written instructions. The Psychological Record, 47, 275-284.
5. EIKESETH, S., & SMITH, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in high-functioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123-133.
6. GOLDIAMOND, I. (1962). Perception. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.), The experimental foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 280-340). New York: Basic Books.
7. GOLDIAMOND, I. (1966). Perception, language, and conceptualization rules. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving: Research, method and theory (pp. 183-224). New York: John Wiley Sons, Inc.
8. HAYES, S. C. (Ed.). (1989). Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies and instructional control. New York: Plenum Press.
9. HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-29). Reno, NV: Context Press.
10. HINELINE, P. N., & WANCHISEN, B. A. (1989). Correlated hypothesizing and the distinction between contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 221-268). New York: Plenum Press.
11. LAZAR, R. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 381-392.
12. MACKAY, H. A., & SIDMAN, M. (1984). Teaching new behavior via equivalence relations. In P. H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 493-513). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. SCHOENFELD, W. N., & CUMMING, W. W. (1963). Behavior and perception. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 5; pp. 213-252). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
15. SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. SIDMAN, M. (1990a). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. SIDMAN, M. (1990b). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In L. R. Hayes & S. C. Hayes (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior: Proceedings of the Third International Institute on Verbal Relations.
18. SIDMAN, M., & CRESSON, O. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalence in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 515-523.
19. SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
20. SIGURDARDOTTIR, Z. G., GREEN, G., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1990). Equivalence classes generated by sequence training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 47-63.
21. SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
22. SKINNER, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
23. SKINNER, B. F. (1987). Upon further reflection. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
24. WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). Transfer of conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125-144.