Preserving free television? Some empirical evidence on the efficacy of must-carry

Journal of Media Economics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-14

  Ford, George S ^a   Jackson, John D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034399759     PISSN: 08997764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327736Me1301_1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Allard, N. (1993). The 1992 Cable Act: Just the beginning. Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 15, 305-355.
2. BIA. (1996). MasterAccess database. Maryland: Author.
3. Federal Communications Commission. (1993). Implementation of the cable television consumer protection and competition act of 1992 broadcast signal carriage issues, 8 F.C.C. Rcd. 2965.
4. Flint, J. (1993). Stations stay for no pay. Broadcasting & Cable, 127, 6, 10.
5. Glauberman, M., & Roberts, S. (1988). Cable system b/c signal carriage survey report. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission.
6. Greene, W. (1997). Econometric analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
7. Hazlett, T. W. (1995). Station brakes: The government's campaign against cable television. Reason, 26, 41-47.
8. Lubinsky, C. (1996). Reconsidering retransmission consent: An examination of the retransmission consent provision (47 U.S.C. S 325[B]) of the 1992 Cable Act. Federal Communications Law Journal, 49, 99-165.
9. Smith, D. J. (1997). Stay the course: A history of the FCC's response to change in the cable industry. Journal of Law and Politics, 13, 715-746.
10. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC, 512 U.S. 622 (1997).
11. Vita, M. G. (1997). Must carry regulations for cable television systems: An empirical analysis. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 12, 159-172.
12. Warren Publishing. (1994). Television and cable factbook: Cable services (electronic version). Washington, DC: Author.
13. Warren Publishing. (1997, April 4). Must-carry said to have big "silver lining" for cable. Communications Daily.