Rates of classroom participation and the validity of sociometry

School Psychology Review

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 251-266

  Hamilton, Chad ^b   Fuchs, Douglas ^a   Fuchs, Lynn S ^b   Roberts, Holley ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034399640     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Ackerman, D., & Howes, C. (1986). Sociometric status and after-school activity of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(1), 416-419.
2. Adams, G., & Cohen, A. (1974). Children's physical and interpersonal characteristics that affect student-teacher interactions. Journal of Experimental Education, 43, 1-5.
3. Agard, J. A., Veldman, D. J., Kaufman, M. J., & Semmel, M. I. (1978). How I feel toward others: An instrument of the PRIME instrument battery. Baltimore: University Park Press.
4. Algozzine, B. (1985). Low achiever differentiation: Where's the beef? Exceptional Children, 52, 72-75.
5. Allington, R. (1980). Teacher interruption behaviors during primary-grade oral reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 371-377.
6. Asher, S. R., & Taylor, A. R. (1981). Social outcomes of mainstreaming: Sociometric assessment and beyond. Exceptional Education Quarterly: Peer Relations of Exceptional Children and Youth, 1, 13-30.
7. Babad, E., Inbar, J., & Rosenthal, R. (1982). Pygmalion, Galatea, and the Golem: Investigations of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 459-474.
8. Beck, S., Collins, L., Overholser, J., & Terry, K. (1984). A comparison of children who receive and who do not receive permission to participate in research. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12,(4), 573-580.
9. Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 631-661.
10. Bryan, T. H. (1974). Peer popularity of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 621-625.
11. Bryan, T. H. & Bryan, J. H. (1990). Social factors in learning disabilities: An overview. In H. L. Swanson & B. Keogh (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Theoretical and research issues (pp. 131-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Cairns, R. B. (1983). Sociometry, psychometry, and social structures: A commentary on six recent studies of popular, rejected and neglected children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(4), 429-438.
13. Cairns, R. B., Gariepy, J., L., & Kindermann, T. (1990). Identifying social clusters in natural settings. Unpublished manuscript. Social Development Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
14. Coben, S. C., & Zigmond, N. (1986). The social integration of learning disabled students from self-contained to mainstream elementary school settings. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 614-618.
15. Coie, J., Dodge, K., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
16. Cook, B.G., & Semmel, M. I. (1999). Peer acceptance of included students with disabilities as a function of severity of disability and classroom composition. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 50-61.
17. Farmer, T. W., & Farmer, E. M. Z. (1996). Social relationships of students with exceptionalities in mainstream classrooms: Social networks and homophily. Exceptional Children. 62(5), 431-450.
18. Foster, S. L., Bell-Dolan, D., & Berler, E. S. (1986). Methodological issues in the use of sociometrics for selecting children for social skills research and training. In R. J. Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families (Vol. 2, pp. 227-248). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
19. Fox, C. L. (1989). Peer acceptance of learning disabled children in the regular classroom. Exceptional Children, 56(1), 50-59.
20. Frame, C. L., & Strauss, C. C. (1987). Parental informed consent and sample bias in grade-school children. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5(2), 227-236.
21. Frelow, R. D., Charry, J., & Freilich, B. (1974). Academic progress and behavior changes in low achieving pupils. Journal of Educational Research, 67(6), 263-266.
22. Fuchs, D., Dempsey, S., Roberts, H., & Kintsch, A. (1995). Best practices in school reintegration. In A. Thomas and J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 879-891). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
23. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294-309.
24. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Fernstrom, P. (1992). Case-by-case reintegration of students with learning disabilities. The Elementary School Journal, 92(3), 261-281.
25. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Fernstrom, P. (1993). A conservative approach to special education reform: Mainstreaming through transenvironmental programming and curriculum-based measurement. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 149-177.
26. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., Lipsey, M., Eaton, S., & Roberts, H. (1999, March). Is "learning disabilities" just a fancy term for underachievement? In D. Fuchs (Chair), Meta-analysis of instructional practices in special education. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
27. Fuchs, D., Roberts, P. H., Fuchs, L. S., & Bowers, J. (1996). Reintegrating students with learning disabilities into the mainstream: A two-year study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(4), 214-229.
28. Gottlieb, B. W., Gottlieb, J., Berkell, D., & Levy, L. (1986). Sociometric status and solitary play of LD boys and girls. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 619-622.
29. Gresham, F. M., & Nagle, R. J. (1980). Social skills training with children: Responsiveness to modeling and coaching as a function of peer orientation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 718-729.
30. Gresham, F. M., & Reschly, D. J. (1987). Sociometric differences between mildly handicapped and non-handicapped black an white students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(2), 195-197.
31. Gresham, F. M., & Stuart, D. (1992). Stability of sociometric assessment: Implications for uses as selection and outcome measures in social skills training. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 223-231.
32. Gronlund, N. E. (1959). Sociometry in the classroom. New York: Harper and Brothers.
33. Hake, J. M. (1967). Covert motivations of good and poor readers. The Reading Teacher, 22(8), 731-738.
34. Hayvren, M., & Hymel, S. (1984). Ethical issues in sociometric testing: Impact of sociometric measures on interaction behavior. Developmental Psychology, 20, 844-849.
35. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (1998). 20 U.S.C.S. §1400 et seq.
36. Iverson, A. M., & Cook, G. L. (1994). Guardian consent for children's participation in sociometric research. Psychology in School, 31, 108-112.
37. Iverson, A. M., & Iverson, G. L. (1996). Children's longterm reactions to participating in a sociometric assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 103-112.
38. Juvonen, J., & Bear, G. (1992). Social adjustment of children with and without learning disabilities in integrated classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 322-330.
39. La Greca, A. M. (Ed.). (1990). Through the eyes of the child. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
40. La Greca, A. M., & Vaughn, S. (1992). Social functioning of individuals with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 21, 340-347.
41. Levy, L., & Gottlieb, J. (1984). Learning disabled and non-learning disabled children at play. Remedial and Special Education, 5(6), 43-50.
42. Mauser, A. L. (1974). Learning disabilities and delinquent youth. Academic Therapy, 9(6), 389-402.
43. Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? New York: Beacon House.
44. Morrison, G. M. (1981). Sociometric measurement: Methodological consideration of its use with mildly learning handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 193-201.
45. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1977). Report and recommendation: Research involving children (DHEW Publication No. [OS] 77-004). Washington, DC: U.S. GPO.
46. Ochoa, S. H., & Olivarez, A. (1995). A meta-analysis of peer rating sociometric studies of pupils with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 29(1), 1-19.
47. Ochoa, S. H., & Palmer, D. J. (1995). Comparison of the peer status of Mexican-American students with learning disabilities and non-disabled, low-achieving students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(1), 57-63.
48. Ochoa, S. H., & Palmer, D. J. (1991). A sociometric analysis of between-group differences and within-group status variability of Hispanic learning disabled and non-handicapped pupils in academic and play contexts. Learning Disability Quarterly. 14(3), 208-218.
49. Paraskevopoulas, J., & McCarthy, J. M. (1970). Behavior patterns of children with special learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools. 7(1), 42-46.
50. Perlmutter, B. F., Crocker, J., Cordray, D., & Garstecki, D. (1983). Sociometric status and related personality characteristics of mainstreamed learning disabled adolescents. (1993). Learning Disability Quarterly. 6(1), 20-30.
51. Pugach, M. (1988). Special education categories as constraints on the reform of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 52-59.
52. Ray, B. M. (1985). Measuring the social position of the mainstreamed handicapped child. Exceptional Children, 52(1), 57-62.
53. Sabornie, E. J. (1987). Bi-directional social status of behaviorally disordered and nonhandicapped elementary school pupils. Behavioral Disorders, Nov., 45-57.
54. Sabornie, E. J., & Kauffman, J. M. (1986). Social acceptance of learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9(1), 55-60.
55. Sabornie, E. J., & Kauffman, J. M. (1985). Regular classroom sociometric status of behaviorally disordered adolescents. Behavioral Disorders, 10, 286-274.
56. Sabornie, E. J., Kauffman, J. M., & Cullinan, D. (1990). Extended sociometric status of adolescents with mild handicaps: A cross-categorical perspective. Exceptionality, 1, 197-209.
57. Sabornie, E. J., Kauffman, J. M., Ellis, E. S., Marshall, K. J., & Elksnin, L. K. (1988). Bi-directional and cross-categorical social status of learning disabled, behaviorally disordered, and nonhandicapped adolescents. The Journal of Special Education, 21(4), 39-56.
58. Sabornie, E. J., Marshall, K. J., & Ellis, E. S. (1990). Restructuring of mainstream sociometry with learning disabled and nonhandicapped students. Exceptional Children, 56(4), 314-323.
59. Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1998). Assessment (seventh edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
60. Sater, G. M., & French, D. C. (1989). A comparison of the social competencies of learning disabled and low achieving elementary-age children. The Journal of Special Education, 23(1), 29-42.
61. Schumaker, J. B., & Hazel, J. S. (1984). Social skills assessment and training for the learning disabled: Who's on first and what's on second? Part I. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 422-431.
62. Seaman, M.A., Levin, J. R., & Serlin, R. C. (1991). New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practical problems. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 577-586.
63. Skrtic, T. M. (1991). Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture and school organization. Denver: Love.
64. Sleeter, C. E. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children, 53, 46-54.
65. Stiliadis, K., & Wiener, J. (1989). Relationship between social perception and peer status in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(10), 624-629.
66. Stone, W.L., & La Greca, A. M. (1990). The social status of children with learning disabilities: A reexamination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 32-37.
67. Swanson, H. L., & Malone, S. (1992). Social skills and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of the literature. School Psychology Review, 21(3), 427-443.
68. Swift, M. S., & Spivak, G. (1969). Clarifying the relationship between academic success and overt classroom behavior. Exceptional Children, 36(2), 99-104.
69. Swift, M. S., & Spivak, G. (1973). Academic success and classroom behavior in secondary schools. Exceptional Children, 39(5), 392-395.
70. Thompson, R. J., & Kronenberger, W. (1990). Behavior problems in children with learning problems. In H. L. Swanson & B. Keogh (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Theoretical and research issues (pp. 155-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Vaughn, S., Elbaum, B. E., & Schumm, J. S. (1996). The effects of inclusion on the social functioning of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(6), 598-608.
72. Vaughn, S., & Haager, D. (1993) Social assessments of students with learning disabilities: Do they measure up? In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Research issues in learning disabilities: Theory, methodology, assessment, and ethics (pp. 276-311). New York: Springer-Verlag.
73. Vaughn, S., Haager, D., Hogan, A., & Kouzekanani, K. (1992). Self-concept and peer acceptance in students with learning disabilities: A four- to five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 43-50.
74. Vaughn, S., & Hogan, A. (1990). Social competence and learning disabilities: A prospective study. In H. L. Swanson & B. Keogh (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Theoretical and research issues (pp. 175-191). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Vaughn, S., & Lancelotta, G. X. (1990). Teaching interpersonal social skills to poorly accepted students: Peer-pairing versus non-peer pairing. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 181-188.
76. Weiner, J. (1987). Peer status of learning disabled children and adolescents: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 62-79.
77. Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357-364.
78. Yager, S., Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Snider, B. (1985). The effects of cooperative and individualistic learning experience on positive and negative cross-handicap relationships. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10(2), 127-138.