The discursive enactment of hegemony: Sexual harassment and academic organizing

Western Journal of Communication

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 190-217

  Townsley, Nikki C ^a   Geist, Patricia ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034397845     PISSN: 10570314     EISSN: 17451027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10570310009374671     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. In A. Mills & P. Tancred (Eds.), Gendering organizational analysis (pp. 248-260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Aisenberg, N., & Harrington, M. (1988). Women of academe: Outsiders in the sacred grove.
3. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy. New York: Monthly Review Press.
4. Baridon, A. P., & Eyler, D. R. (1996). Sexual harassment awareness training: 60 practical activities for trainers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Barker, J. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408-437.
6. Barker, J. R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Belenky, M. J., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
8. Bell, E., & Forbes, L. C. (1994). Office folklore in the academic paperwork empire: The interstitial space of gendered (con)texts. Text and Performance Quarterly, 14, 181-196.
9. Blair, C., Brown, J. R., & Baxter, L. A. (1994). Disciplining the feminine. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80, 383—409.
10. Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
12. Clair, R. P. (1993a). The bureaucratization, commodification, and privatization of sexual harassment through institutional discourse. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 123-157.
13. Clair, R. P. (1993b). The use of framing devices to sequester organizational narratives: Hegemony and harassment. Communication Monographs, 60, 113-136.
14. Clair, R. P. (1994). Resistance and oppression as a self-contained opposite: An organizational communication analysis of one man’s story of sexual harassment. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 235-262.
15. Clair, R. P. (1998). Organizing silence: A world of possibilities. Albany: State University of New York Press.
16. Cockbum, C. (1991). In the way of women: Men’s resistance to sex equality in organizations. London: Macmillan.
17. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Dalaimo, D. M. (1997). Electronic sexual harassment. In B. R. Sandler & R. J. Shoop (Eds.), Sexual harassment on campus: A guide for administrators, faculty, and students (pp. 85-103). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Deetz, S. A. (1993). Future of the discipline: The challenges, the research, the social contribution. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 16 (pp. 565-600). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Dervin, B. (1993). Verbing communication: Mandate for disciplinary intervention. Journal of Communication, 43, 45-54.
21. Doughterty, D. S. (1999). Dialogue through standpoint: Understanding women’s and men’s standpoints of sexual harassment. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 436-468.
22. Dziech, B. W., & Weiner, L. (1990). The lecherous professor: Sexual harassment on campus. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
23. Ferguson, K. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
24. Fitzgerald, L. F. (1993). Sexual harassment: A research analysis and agenda for the 1990’s. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 5-27.
25. Foss, K. A., & Rogers, R. A. (1994). Particularities and possibilities: Reconceptualizing knowledge and power in sexual harassment research. In S. G. Bingham (Ed.), Conceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practice (pp. 159-178). Westport, CT: Praeger.
26. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (Alan M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
27. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (Alan M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
28. Geist, P., & Townsley, N. C. (1997, November). “Swept under the rug"and other disappearing acts: Legitimate concerns for university’s sexual harassment policy and procedures. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
29. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
32. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Goldberg, C. (1999, March 23). M.I.T. admits discrimination against female professors. New York Times, pp. On-Line.
34. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Quintin Hoare Geoflrey Nowell Smith, Trans.). New York: International Publishers.
35. Gregg, N. (1993). Politics of identity/politics of location: Women workers organizing in a postmodern world. Women’s Studies in Communication, 16,1-33.
36. Hall, S. (1985). Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the poststructuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2, 91-114.
37. Hawkins, K. (1994). Analyzing the pure case: Women’s narratives of academic life. Women’s Studies in Communication, 17, 1-25.
38. Hearn, J., Sheppard, D. L., Tancred-Sheriff, P., & Burrell, G. (Eds.). (1989). The sexuality of organization. London: Sage.
39. Herman, J. (1997, November). Business and pleasure: The implications of consensual relationships in academe. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
40. Hughes, E. C. (1971). The study of occupations. In E. C. Hughes (Ed.), The sociological eye (pp. 283-297). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
41. Irvine, L. (1997). A “consensual” relationship. In B. R. Sandler & R. J. Shoop (Eds.), Sexual harassment on campus: A guide for administrators, faculty, and students (pp. 234-247). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
42. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
43. Langelan, M. J. (1993). Back off!: How to confront and stop sexual harassment and harassers. New York: Simon & Schuster.
44. Lindlof, T. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. MacKinnon, C. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46. Martin, J. (1994). The organization of exclusion: Institutionalization of sex inequality, gendered faculty jobs and gendered knowledge in organizational theory and research. Organization, 1, 401-432.
47. Mills, A. L., & Tancred, P. (Eds.). (1992). Gendering organizational analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48. Mumby, D. K. (1993). Critical organizational communication studies: The next ten years. Communication Monographs, 60, 18-25.
49. Mumby, D. K. (1996). Feminism, postmodernism, and organizational communication: A critical reading. Management Communication Quarterly, 9, 259-295.
50. Mumby, D. K. (1997a). Modernism, postmodernism, and communication studies: Arereading of an ongoing debate. Communication Theory, 7, 1-28.
51. Mumby, D. K. (1997b). The problem of hegemony: Rereading Gramsci for organizational communication studies. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 343-375.
52. Mumby, D. K. (1998). Organizing men: Power, discourse, and the social construction of masculinity(s) in the workplace. Communication Theory, 8,164-182.
53. Murphy, A. G. (1998). Hidden transcripts of flight attendant resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 499-535.
54. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
55. Paludi, M. A. (Ed.). (1996). Sexual harassment on college campuses: Abusing the ivory power (2nd. ed.). Albany: State University of New York Press.
56. Periy, L. A. M., & Geist, P. (1997). Introduction. In L. A. M. Perry & P. Geist (Eds.), Courage of conviction: Women’s words, women’s voices (pp. 1-15). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
57. Petronio, S., Flores, L. A., & Hecht, M. L. (1997). Locating the voice of logic: Disclosure discourse of sexual abuse. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 101-113.
58. Rabinowitz, K. (1996). Coping with sexual harassment. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Sexual harassment on college campuses: Abusing the ivory power (pp. 199-214). Albany: State University of New York Press.
59. Reissman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60. Rich, A. (1985). Notes toward a politics of location. In M. Diaz-Diocaretz & I. M. Zavala (Eds.), Women, feminist identity and society in the 1980’s: Selected papers (pp. 7-22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
61. Sandler, B. R. (1997). Student-to-student harassment. In B. R. Sandler & R. J. Shoop (Eds.), Sexual harassment on campus: A guide for administrators, faculty, and students (pp. 50-65). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
62. Sandler, B. R., & Shoop, R. J. (1997a). What is sexual harassment? In B. R. Sandler & R. J. Shoop (Eds.), Sexual harassment on campus: A guide for administrators, faculty, and students (pp. 1-21). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
63. Sandler, B. R., & Shoop, R. J. (Eds.). (1997b). Sexual harassment on campus: A guide for administrators, faculty, and students. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
64. Scott, J. W. (1992). Experience. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 22-40). New York: Routledge.
65. Seals, B. (1997). Faculty-to-faculty sexual harassment. In B. R. Sandler & R. J. Shoop (Eds.), Sexual harassment on campus: A guide for administrators, faculty, and students (pp. 66-84). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
66. Siegel, D. (1991). Sexual harassment: Research and resources. New York: National Council for Research on Women.
67. Skaine, R. (Ed.). (1996). Power and gender: Issues in sexual dominance and harassment. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
68. Stites, M. C. (1996). What’s wrong with faculty-student consensual sexual relationships? In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Sexual harassment on college campuses: Abusing the ivory power (pp. 115-140). Albany: State University of New York Press.
69. Strine, M. (1992). Understanding “how things work”: Sexual harassment and academic culture. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 391-400.
70. Taylor, B. C., & Conrad, C. (1992). Narratives of sexual harassment: Organizational dimensions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 401-418.
71. Tbng, R. (1984). Women, sex and the law. Tbtowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
72. Tbwnsley, N. C. (1998, October). Healing epiphanies: (Recovering self and furthering understanding after sexual harassment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language, and Gender, Portland, ME.
73. Trethewey, A. (1997). Resistance, identity, and empowerment: A postmodern feminist analysis of clients in a human service organization. Communication Monographs, 64, 281-301.
74. Varallo, S. M., Ray, E. B., & Ellis, B. H. (1998). Speaking of incest: The research interview as social justice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 254-271.
75. Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
76. Wood, J. (1992). Telling our stories: Narratives as a basis for theorizing sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 349-362.
77. Wood, J. (1994). Saying it makes it so: The discursive construction of sexual harassment. In S. G. Bingham (Ed.), Conceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practice (pp. 17-30). Westport, CT: Praeger.
78. Zalk, S. R. (1996). Men in the academy: A psychological profile of harassers. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Sexual harassment on college campuses: Abusing the ivory power (2nd ed., pp. 81-114). Albany: State University of New York Press.