Real exchange rates and unit root tests

Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 478-490

  Parikh, Ashok ^a   Wakerly, Elizabeth ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034395039     PISSN: 00432636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02707290     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Blough, S. R. (1992). The Relationship between Power and Level for Generic Unit Root Tests in Finite Samples. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7 (3): 295-308.
2. Christiano, L. J., and M. Eichenbaum (1990). Unit Roots in Real GNP: Do We Know and Do We Care? Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 32:7-61.
3. Coakley, J., and A. M. Fuertes (1997). New Panel Unit Root Tests of PPP. Economics Letters 57 (1): 17-22.
4. Cochrane, J. (1991). A Critique of the Application of Unit Root Tests. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 15 (2): 275-284.
5. Cheung, Y., and K. S. Lai (1993). Finite Sample Sizes of Johansen's Likelihood Ratio Tests for Cointegration. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 55 (3): 313-328.
6. Enders, W. (1995). Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: Wiley.
7. Huizinga, J. (1987). An Empirical Investigation of the Long-Run Behaviour of Real Exchange Rates. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 27:149-214.
8. Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin (1998). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. University of Cambridge mimeo, Cambridge.
9. Johansen, S., and K. Juselius (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration - with Applications to the Demand for Money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52 (2): 169-210.
10. Larsson, R., J. Lyhagen, and M. Lothgren (1998). Likelihood Based Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels. Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance No. 250. Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.
11. Levin, A., and C-F. Lin (1992). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. University of California Working Paper 92, 23. University of California, San Diego.
12. Lothian, J., and M. Taylor (1996). Real Exchange Rate Behaviour: The Recent Float from the Perspective of the Past Two Centuries. Journal of Political Economy 104 (3): 488-509.
13. MacDonald, R. (1996). Panel Unit Root Tests and Real Exchange Rates. Economics Letters 50 (1): 7-11.
14. O'Connell, P. G. J. (1998). The Overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of International Economics 44 (1): 1-19.
15. Oh, K. Y. (1996). Purchasing Power Parity and Unit Root Tests using Panel Data. Journal of International Money and Finance 15 (3): 405-418.
16. Pantula, S. G., G. Gonzalez-Farias, and W. A. Fuller (1994). A Comparison of Unit-Root Test Criteria. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12 (4): 449-459.
17. Phillips, P. C. B., and H. R. Moon (1999). Nonstationary Panel Data Analysis: An Overview of Some Recent Developments. Cowles Discussion Paper 1221. Yale University, New Haven.
18. Rogoff, K. (1996). The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature 34 (2): 647-668.
19. Roll, R. (1979). Violations of Purchasing Power Parity Theory and their Implications for Efficient International Commodity Markets. In M. Sarnat and G. Szego (eds.), International Finance and Trade. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
20. Taylor, M. (1995). The Economics of Exchange Rates. Journal of Economic Literature 33 (1): 13-47.
21. Wu, Y. (1996). Are Real Exchange Rates Non-Stationary? Evidence from a Panel Data Test. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28 (1): 54-63.
22. Zivot, E., and D. W. K. Andrews (1992). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10 (3): 251-270.