The measurement of pH in raw and frozen turkey Pectoralis superficialis muscle

Meat Science

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 503-506

  Santé, Véronique ^a,b   Fernandez, X F ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b CIDEF F 35310   (France)

Author keywords

Method; Muscle pH; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034392314     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00174-6     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bendall J.R. Post mortem changes in muscle. Bourne G.H. Structure and function of muscle. 1973;243-309 Academic Press, New York.
2. Kivikari, R., & Puolanne E. (1989). The rate of pH decline after slaughter in pigs of different ages. Comparison of two methods used for measuring pH in muscle. In Proceedings of the 35th ICMST, (pp. 201-209) Copenhagen, Denmark.
3. Maki-Petays O., Korkeala H., Alanko T., Sorvettula O. Comparison of different pH measurement methods in meat. Acta Veterinaria. Scandinavica. 32:1991;123-129.
4. Roseiro L.C., Santos C., Almeida J., Melo R.S. Measurements of pH60 in pork using ISFET/REFET and glass electrode methods. Meat Science. 38:1994;347-351.
5. ™ User's guide for personal computers. Release 6.03. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
6. Solomon M.B. Comparison of methods used for measuring pH in muscle tissue. Journal of Food Science. 52(5):1987;1428-1429.
7. Sante V., Lebert A., Le Pottier G., Ouali A. Comparison between two statistical models for prediction of turkey breast meat colour. Meat Science. 43(3-4):1996;283-290.
8. Sosnicki A., Greaser M., Pietrzak M., Pospiech E., Sante V. PSE-like syndrome in breast muscle of domestic turkeys: a review. Journal of Muscle Food. 9:1998;13-23.