Humic Substances as Interferences in the Analysis of Nitrite in Water

Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 134-146

  Tebault, Stephanie A ^a   Poziomek, Edward J ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Griess reaction; Humic acids; Humic substances; Nitrite analysis; Water analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034392130     PISSN: 1086900X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6521(2000)4:2/3<134::aid-fact7>3.0.co;2-w     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Thurman EM. Organic geochemistry of raturai waters. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey; 1986. pp 276-279, 355-359, 418.
2. Cho SJ. The characterization of humic substances using capillary electrophoresis methods. Unpublished review, Chemistry 610. Norfolk, VA: Old Dominion University; 1999.
3. Crockett AB, Craig HD, Jenkins TF. Sisk WE. Field sampling and selecting on-site analytical methods for explosives in soil. U.S. EPA Technology Support Center for Monitoring and Site Characterization, Report No. EPA/540/R-97/501. Las Vegas, NV: National Exposure Laboratory Characterization Research Division; 1996.
4. Griess JP. Philos Trans R Soc (London) 1864;679.
5. Griess JP. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 1879;12:426.
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Standard methods for the examination for water and wastewater, method 420 (14th ed.). Washington. DC: American Public Health Association; 1975. p 434.
7. - exchange properties of a soil humic acid, an experimental and modeling study. Environ Sci Technol 1999;33:786-795.
8. Benedetti F, Milne CJ, Kinniburgh DG, van Riemsdijk WH, Koopal LK. Metal ion binding to humic substances: Application of the non-ideal competitive adsorption model. Environ Sci Technol 1995;29: 446-457.
9. Glaus MA, Hummel W, van Loon LR. Stability of mixed-ligand complexes of metal ions with humic substances and low molecular weight ligands. Environ Sci Technol 1995;29:2150-2153.
10. Green SA, Morel FMM, Blough NV. Investigation of the electrostatic properties of humic substances by fluorescence quenching. Environ Sci Technol 1992;26:294-302.
11. Fitch A, Du J. Solute transport in clay media: Effect of humic acid. Environ Sci Technol 1996;30:12-15.
12. Leenheer JA, Browr GK, MacCarthy P. Cabanniss SE. Models of metal binding structures in fulvic acid from the Suwannee River, Georgia Environ Sci Technol 1998;32:2410-2416.
13. Leenheer JA, Wershaw RL, Reddy MM. Strong-acid, carboxyl-group structures in fulvic acid from the Suwannee River, Georgia. 1. Minor structures. 2. Major structures. Environ Sci Technol 1995;29:393-405.
14. Nagata Y, Hirai K, Bandow H, Maeda Y. Decomposition of hydroxybenzoic and humic acids in water by ultrasonic irradiation. Environ Sci Technol 1996;30:1133-1138.
15. Sein LT, Jr., Varnum JM, Jansen SA. Conformational modeling of a new building block of humic acid: Approaches to the lowest energy conformer. Environ Sci Technol 1999;33:546-552.
16. Hogendoorn EA, Dijkman E, Baumann B. Strategies in using analytical restricted access media columns for the removal of humic acid interferences in the trace analysis of acidic herbicides in water samples by coupled column liquid chromatography with UV detection. Anal Chem 1999;71:1111-1118.