The planning of serological investigations and interpretation of results in swine respiratory disease - A literature review;Die Planung serologischer Untersuchungen und Interpretation der Befunde am Beispiel porziner Atemwegserkrankungen Eine Literaturstudie

Tierarztliche Praxis Ausgabe G: Grosstiere - Nutztiere

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 40-46

  Beilage, Elisabeth Große ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interpretation of results; Planning serological investigations; Respiratory disease; Serology; Swine

Indexed keywords

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0034387623     PISSN: 14341220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bachmann P. Beitrag zur Epidemiologie der kontagiösen Pleuropneumonie beim Schwein. Schweiz Arch Tierheilk 1972; 114: 362-82.
2. Baysinger A. Use of descriptive statistics in interpretation of population serology. In: 30th Ann Meeting American Assoc Swine Pract, St. Louis, Missouri, Proc, 1999: 345-63.
3. Cannon RM, Roe RT. Livestock disease surveys: A field manual for veterinarians. Australian Bureau of Animal Health, Canberra, 1982.
4. Charley B. Local immunity in the pig respiratory tract. I. Cellular and humoral immune responses following swine influenza infection. Ann Microbiol 1977; 128B: 95-107.
5. Connor JF. Health matching strategies introduction of breeding stock. In: 25th Ann Meeting American Assoc Swine Pract, Chicago, Proc, 1994: 277-82.
6. Dewey C. Epidemiological principles affecting serological testing for diseases of swine. In: 33rd Ann George A Young Swine Conf, Nebraska, Lincoln, 1994: 77-83.
7. Done SH. Enzootic pneumonia (mycoplasmosis) revisited. Pig Vet J 1996; 38: 40-61.
8. Easterday BC. Immunologic considerations in swine influenza. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1972; 160: 645-8.
9. Gardner IA. The science behind serologic sampling. In: AD Leman Swine Conf, St Paul, Proc, 1994: 89-93.
10. Gardner IA, Blanchard PB. Interpretation of laboratory results. In: Diseases of swine. 9th ed, Straw BE et al., eds. London: Wolfe Publishing Ltd, 1999: 19-39.
11. Gardner IA, Greiner M. Advances methods for test validation and interpretation in veterinary medicine. Freie Universität Berlin, ISBN 3-929619-22-9, 1999.
12. Gerstmann BB, Cappucci DT. Evaluating the reliability of diagnostic test results. J Vet Med Assoc 1986; 188: 248-51.
13. große Beilage. Eigene unveröffentlichte Ergebnisse. 14. Hill HT. Serum profiling/interpretation. In: 25th Ann Meeting American Assoc Swine Pract, Chicago, Proc, 1994: 274-6.
14. Houben S, Callebaut P, Pensaert MB. Comparative study of a blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the immunoperoxidase monolayer assay for the detection of antibodies to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in pigs. J Virol Methods 1995; 51: 125-8.
15. Janke BH. Serology in the diagnosis of respiratory disease in swine. In: 39th Ann George A Young Swine Conf, Nebraska, Lincoln, 1998: 1-12.
16. Kreienbrock L, Schach S. Epidemiologische Methoden. 2. Aufl. Stuttgart, Jena: Fischer 1997.
17. Laude H, van Reeth K, Pensaert M. Porcine respiratory coronavirus: Molecular features and virus-host interactions. Vet Res 1993; 24: 125-50.
18. Leiner G. Etablierung eines ELISA zur Erkennung klinischer und subklinischer Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae-Infektionen beim Schwein. Diss med vet, Hannover 1998.
19. Martin SW, Shoukri M, Thorburn MA. Evaluating the health status of herds based on test applied to individuals. Prev Vet Med 1992; 14: 33-43.
20. Monfort JD, Miller GY. Evaluation and application of diagnostic tests in food animal practice. Comp Cont Educ 1990; 12: 1182-92.
21. Morris CR, Gardner IA, Hietala SK, Carpenter TE, Anderson RJ, Parker KM. Persistence of passively acquired antibodies to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in a swine herd. Prev Vet Med 1994; 21: 29-41.
22. Morrison RB, Gorcyca DE, Spiess DE, Molitor TW, Murtaugh M, Schlesinger KJ, Chladek DW, Harris LL. Influence of maternal immunity on infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PPRS) virus. In: 14th Congr Int Pig Vet Soc, Bologna, Proc, 1996: 60.
23. Müller E, Jeckstadt S, Schöss P. Nachweis von komplement-bindenden Antikörpern gegen Haemophilus (Actinobacillus) pleuropneumoniae in einigen Schweinebeständen Nordwestdeutschlands. Tierärztl Umsch 1987; 42: 356-62.
24. Nielsen R. Seroepidemiology of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Can Vet J 1988; 29: 578-80.
25. Pensaert MB, Cox E. Porcine respiratory coronavirus related to Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus. Agri-Practice 1989; 10: März/April 17-21.
26. Poppe B. Untersuchungen zur Prävalenz von Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae-Antikörpern bei Mastschweinen unter Berücksichtigung betriebsspezifischer Einflußfaktoren und klinische Prüfung der Wirksamkeit einer Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae-Subunit-Vakzine. Diss med vet, Hannover 1997.
27. Roth JA. Immune system. In: Diseases of swine. 7th ed, Leman AD et al., London, Wolfe Publishing Ltd, 1992: 21-39.
28. Sørensen V, Ahrens P, Barfod K, Fenstra AA, Feld NC, Friis NF, Bille-Hansen V, Jensen NE, Pedersen MW. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in pigs: Duration of the disease and evaluation of four diagnostic assays. Vet Microbiol 1997; 54: 23-34.
29. Stevenson G. Common mistakes in interpretation of population serology. In: 30th Ann Meeting American Assoc Swine Pract, St Louis, Missouri, Proc, 1999: 339-43.
30. Tyler JW, Cullor JS. Titers, tests, and truisms: Rational interpretation of diagnostic serology testing. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 194: 1550-8.
31. Tyler JW. Application of serologic test results in disease eradication Programms. In: 25th Ann Meeting American Assoc Swine Pract, Chicago, Proc, 1994: 271-73.
32. White AK. Update on serologic assays used in the diagnosis of infectious diseases of swine. In: 33rd Ann George A Young Swine Conf, Nebraska, Lincoln, 1994: 84-7.
33. Yoon, KJ, Zimmerman JJ, Swenson LL, McGinley MJ, Eernisse K, Brevik A, Rhinehart LL, Frey ML, Hill HT, Platt KB. Characterization of the humoral immune response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus infection. J Vet Diagn Invest 1995; 7: 305-12.