Power, responsibility, and governance in Britain's new urban policy

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 175-191

  Kearns, Ade ^a   Turok, Ivan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034386631     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0735-2166.00049     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Association of Metropolitan Authorities in association with Association of County Councils. (1996). A New Deal for Regeneration. London: AMA.
2. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1995). Globalisation, institutional "thickness" and the local economy. In P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. A. Graham, & A. Madanipour (Eds.). Managing Cities - The New Urban Context, 91-108. Chichester: John Wiley.
3. Atkinson, R. (1998, May). Contemporary British urban policy. Note prepared for European Urban Research Association Workshop, Venice.
4. Audit Commission. (1989). Urban regeneration and economic development: The local government dimension. London: HMSO.
5. Brennan, A., Rhodes, J. & Tyler, P. (1999). The distribution of SRB challenge fund expenditure in relation to local-area need in England. Urban Studies, 36(12) 2069-2084.
6. Cochrane, A., Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (1996). Manchester plays games: Exploring the local politics of globalisation. Urban Studies, 33, 1319-1336.
7. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). (1997). Regeneration programmes - The way forward. Consultation Paper. London: DETR.
8. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). (1998). Single regeneration budget bidding guidance: A guide for partnerships. London: DETR.
9. Department of Land Economy (DLE). (1996). Evaluation of the single regeneration budget challenge fund: An examination of unsuccessful bids. Discussion Paper 74. Cambridge: DLE, University of Cambridge.
10. Dewar, D. (1998). Scottish urban regeneration forum inaugural annual lecture, Address by the Secretary of State for Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
11. Downer, S. (1999). Who's in the money. New Start, 7(24), 11.
12. Duguid, G. J. (1995). Deprived areas in Scotland: Results of an analysis of the 1991 census. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office Central Research Unit.
13. Fordham, G., Hutchinson, J. & Foley, P. (1999). Strategic approaches to local regeneration: The single regeneration budget challenge fund. Regional Studies, 33(2), 131-141.
14. Gibb, K., Kearns, A., Keoghan, M., Mackay, D. & Turok, I. (1998). Revising the Scottish area deprivation index (Vol. 1). Edinburgh: The Scottish Office Central Research Unit.
15. Goodwin, M., & Painter, J. (1997). Concrete research, urban regimes and regulation theory. In M. Lauria (Ed.), Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulating urban politics in a global economy, 13-29. London: Sage.
16. Hall, S., Beazley, M., Bentley, G., Burfitt, A., Collinge, C., Lee, P., Loftman, P., Nevin, P. & Srbljanin, A. (1996). The single regeneration budget: A review of challenge fund round II. Birmingham: Centre for Urban and Regional Studies.
17. Hall, S. , Nevin, B., Beazley, M., Burfitt, A., Collinge, C., Lee, P. Loftman, P. & Srbljanin, A. (1998). Competition, partnership and regeneration: Lessons from three rounds of the single regeneration budget challenge fund. Birmingham: School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham.
18. Hall, S., & Mawson, J. (1999). Challenge funding, contracts and area regeneration. Bristol: Policy Press/JRF.
19. Hall, S., & Nevin, B. (1999). Continuity and change: A review of English regeneration policy in the 1990s. Regional Studies, 33(5), 477-482.
20. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
21. Healey, P., de Magalhaes, C., & Madanipour, A. (1998, July). Institutional capacity-building, urban planning and urban regeneration projects. Paper to AESOP Congress, Aveiro, Portugal.
22. Hetherington, P. (1999, December 7). Life's tougher up north, insist Labour MPs. The Guardian, p. 10.
23. Hutchinson, J. (1995). Can partnerships which fail succeed?: The case of city challenge. Local Government Policy Making, 22(3), 41-51.
24. Imrie, R., & Raco, M. (1999). How new is the new local governance? Lessons from the United King. dom. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series, 24(1), 45-63.
25. Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Journal of Social Science, 55, 29-45.
26. John, P., Ward, H., Dowding, K., & Page, E. (1999, June). 'The UK pork barrel: Competitive funding regimes and the political targeting of urban program schemes.' Paper to the ESRC 'Cities' Convention, University of Birmingham, Southampton: Department of Politics, University of Southampton.
27. Johnston, R., & Pattie, C. (1996). Local government in governance: The 1994-95 restructuring of local government in England. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20(4), 671-96.
28. Kearns, A. (1998, May). Scottish urban policy and research. Note prepared for European Urban Research Association Workshop, Venice.
29. Le Gales, P., & Mawson, J. (1995). Contracts versus competitive bidding: Rationalizing urban policy programmes in England and France. Journal of European Public Policy, 2(2), 205-241.
30. Le Grand, J. (1999). How to cage the fat-cats. New Statesman, 26 July, 25-27.
31. Mossberger, K., & Stoker, G. (1997). Inner-city policy in Britain: Why it will not go away. Urban Affairs Review, 32(3), 378-402.
32. Nevin, B., Loftman, P., & Beazley, M. (1997). Cities in crisis - is growth the answer? An analysis of the outcomes of the first and second rounds of the single regeneration budget challenge fund. Town Planning Review, 68(2), 145-164.
33. Oatley, N. (Ed.) (1998). Cities, economic competition and urban policy. London: Paul Chapman.
34. Oatley, N., & Lambert, C. (1995). Evaluating competitive urban policy: The city challenge initiative. In R. Hambleton & H. Thomas (Eds.), Urban Policy Evaluation: Challenge and Change, 141-157. London: Paul Chapman.
35. Pierre, J. (1998). Public-private partnerships and urban governance: An introduction. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Partnerships in urban governance, 1-8. London: Macmillan.
36. Raco, M. (1998). Assessing "institutional thickness" in the local context. Environment and Planning A, 30, 975-996.
37. Reid, P., & Church, A. (1998, May). Urban policy in the UK: The past, the present and the future. Note prepared for the European Urban Research Association Workshop, Venice.
38. Rhodes, R. (1995). The New Governance: Governing without government. Paper to State of Britain Seminar Series. Swindon: ESRC.
39. Robson, B., Deas, I., Parkinson, M., & Robinson, F. (1994). Assessing the impact of urban policy. London: Department of the Environment.
40. Russell, H., Dawson, J., Garside, P., & Parkinson, M. (1996). City challenge interim national evaluation. London: The Stationery Office.
41. Scottish Executive. (1999). Social justice . . . a Scotland where everyone matters. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
42. Scottish Office. (1991). Review of the urban programme. Consultation Paper. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
43. Scottish Office. (1993). Progress in partnership. Consultation Paper on the Future of Urban Regeneration Policy in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
44. Scottish Office. (1995a). Progress for partnership. Consultation Paper on Implementation Arrangements. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
45. Scottish Office. (1995b). Progress for partnership: Outcome of the review of urban regeneration policy. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
46. Scottish Office. (1998a). Social inclusion partnerships: Invitation to submit expressions of interest. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office Development Department.
47. Solesbury, W. (1993). Reframing urban policy. Policy and Politics, 21, 31-38.
48. Stoker, G. (1996a). Governance as theory: Five propositions. Paper to the conference entitled Enjeux Des Debates sur La Governance, Universite de Lausanne, 29-30 November 1996.
49. Stoker, G. (1996b). Theory and urban politics. Paper to the PSA Annual Conference, 11 April 1996, Glasgow.
50. Stoker, G. (1998). Public-private partnerships and urban governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Partnerships in urban governance, 34-52. London: Macmillan.
51. Taylor, P., Turok, I., & Hastings, A. (1999). An examination of unsuccessful priority partnership area bids. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.
52. Turok, I. (1999). Inclusive cities: Building local capacity for development. Summary report and policy guidelines. Glasgow: Glasgow Development Agency and European Commission.
53. Turok, I., & Hopkins, N. (1998). Competition and area selection in Scotland's new urban policy. Urban Studies, 35(11), 2021-2061.
54. Ward, K. G. (1997). The single regeneration budget and the issue of local flexibility. Regional Studies, 34, 78-81.