A multiple criteria decision making approach for electricity planning in spain: Economic versus environmental objectives

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 736-743

  Linares, P ^a   Romero, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PONTIFICIA COMILLAS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Compromise programming; Energy; Environmental studies; Multiple criteria decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034385585     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600944     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. European Commission (1995). An energy policy for the European Union: White Paper, COM(95) 682.
2. Hobbs B F (1996). Energy vs. the environment. OR/MS Today, December.
3. Petrovic R and Kralj B (1993). Economic and environmental power dispatch. Eur J Opl Res 64: 2-11.
4. European Commission (1995). Externalities of Fuel Cycles ‘ExternE’ Project. Report 2, Methodology. European Commission, DOXII, Luxembourg.
5. Merrill HM, Schweppe FC and White DC (1982). Energy strategy planning for electric utilities. Part 1, the SMARTE methodology. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst 101: 340-346.
6. Yang HT and Chen SL (1989). Incorporating a multi-criteria decision procedure into the combined dynamic programming/ production simulation algorithm for generation expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 4: 165-175.
7. Ramanathan R and Ganesh LS (1995). Energy resource allocation incorporating qualitative and quantitative criteria: an integrated model using goal programming and AHP. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 29: 197-218.
8. Steuer RE (1994a). Manual for the ADBASE multiple objective linear programming package. Faculty of Management Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
9. Steuer RE (1994b). Random problem generation and the computation of efficient extreme points in multiple objective linear programming. Comp Opt Appl 3: 333-347.
10. Yu PL (1973). A class of solutions for group decision problems. Mgmt Sci 19: 936-946.
11. Zeleny M (1974). A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal. Comp Opns Res 1: 479-496.
12. Yu PL (1985). Multiple-Criteria Decision Making. Concepts, Techniques and Extensions. Plenum Press; New York.
13. Blasco F, Cuchillo-Ibanez E, Moron MA and Romero C (1999). On the monotonicity of the compromise set in multicriteria problems. J Opt Theory Appl 102: 69-82.
14. Ballestero E and Romero C (1991). A theorem connecting utility function optimization and compromise programming. Opns Res Letters 10: 421-427.
15. Moran MA, Romero C and Ruiz del Portal FR (1996). Generating well-behaved utility functions for compromise programming. J Opt Theory Appl 91: 643-649.
16. Tamiz M, Jones D and Romero C (1998). Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art. Eur J Opl Res 111: 569-581.
17. Romero C (1998). Extended lexicographic goal programming: A unifying approach. Presented at the Third International conference on Multi-objective Programming and Goal Programming (MOPGP98), Quebec, Canada.
18. Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G and Papagiannakis L (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Comp Opns Res 22: 763-770.
19. Hobbs BF and Horn GTF (1997). Building public confidence in energy planning: A multimethod MCDM approach to demand- side planning at BC gas. Energy Policy 25: 357-375.
20. Santy TL (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, and Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill; New York.
21. Saaty TL (1994). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24: 19-43.
22. Barzilai J and Golany B (1994). AHP rank reversal, normalization and aggregation rules. INFOR 32: 57-64.
23. Bryson N (1995). A goal programming method for generating priority vectors. J Opl Res Soc 46: 641-648.
24. Ramanathan R and Ganesh LS (1994). Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weights. Eur J Opl Res 79: 249-265.
25. International Energy Agency (1996). Guidebook on analytical methods and processes for integrated planning. IEA DSM Implementing Agreement. Ley 54/1997, de 27 de Noviembre, del Sector Eletrico. BOE no 285, 28th November 1997.
26. Messner S and Strubegger M (1991). User’s guide to CO2DB: The IIASA CO2 Technology Data Bank. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
27. European Commission (1997). E3-TDB Energy Technology Database. Climate Technology Strategy Within Competitive Energy Markets. JOULE-II project no. JOS3-CT95-0008. Final Report. CEC DG XII F. Brussels.
28. Ministerio de Industriay Energia (1997). La energia en Espana 1995-2020. Propuesta de estudio. Grupo de Trabajo de Prospectiva MINER-IDAE, Madrid.
29. Linares P (1999). Integration de criterios medioambientales en procesos de decision: una aproximacion multicriterio a la planificacion integrada de recursos eletricos. PhD Thesis, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid. (available at http://www. iit.upco.es/-pedrol).