Users' recognition of semantic affinity among tasks and the effects of consistency

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 89-105

  Park, Jisoo ^a   Yoon, Wan Chul ^b   Ryu, Hokyoung ^b  

^a Daewoo Electronics Co   (South Korea)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS;

COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY; CONSISTENT PROCEDURES; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; ELECTRONIC DEVICE; SEMANTIC AFFINITY; SOFTWARE PROGRAM; TASK KNOWLEDGE; TASK PROCEDURES;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 0034385029     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1201_4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.
2. Barnard, P. J., Hammond, N. V., Morton, J., & Long, J. B. (1981). Consistency and compatibility inhuman-computer dialogue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 15,87-134.
3. Brown, C. M. L. (1988). Humane-computer interface design guidelines. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Grudin, J. (1989). The case against user interface consistency. Communications of the ACM, 32, 1164-1173.
6. Kellogg, W. A. (1987). Conceptual consistency in the user interface: Effects on user performance. In H. J. Bulinger & B. Shackel (Eds.), Human-computer interaction; INTERACT '87 IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 389-394). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
7. Marshall, C., Nelson, C., & Gardiner, M. M. (1987). Design guidelines. In M. M. Gardiner & B. Christie (Eds.), Applying cognitive psychology to user-interface design (pp. 221-278). Chichester, England: Wiley.
8. Mayhew, D. J. (1992). Principles and guidelines in software user interface design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Moran, T. P. (1983). Getting into a system: External-internal task mapping analysis. In A. Janda (Ed.), CHI '83 Conference Proceedings (pp. 45-49). New York: ACM.
10. Nelson, W. (1982). Applied life data analysis. New York: Wiley.
11. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Orlando, FL: AP Professional.
12. Ozok, A., & Salvendy, G. (in press). Measuring consistency of Web page design and its effects on performance and satisfaction. Ergonomics.
13. Payne, S. J., & Green, T. R. G. (1983). The user's perception of the interaction language: A two level model. In A. Janda (Ed.), CHJ '83 Conference Proceedings (pp. 202-206). New York: ACM.
14. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Tokyo: Addison Wesley Longman.
15. Smith, S. L., & Mosier, J. N. (1986). Guidelines for designing user interface software (Tech. Rep. No. ESD-TR-86-278). United States Air Force Electronic Systems Center, Hanscom AFB, MA.
16. Tanaka, T., Eberts, R. E., & Salvendy, G. (1991). Consistency of human-computer interface design: Quantification and validation. Human Factors, 33(6), 653-676.
17. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
18. Yoon, W. C, Park, J. S., & Lee, S. H. (1996). A diagrammatic model for representing user's interface knowledge of task procedures. In H. Yoshikawa & E. Hollnagel (Eds.), Proceedings of Cognitive Systems Engineering in Process Control '96 (pp. 276-284). Kyoto, Japan: CSEPC96 Organizing Committee.