Evaluation of a probe for predicting beef tenderness

Meat Science

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 493-502

  Jeremiah, L E ^a   Phillips, D M ^b  

^a AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^b Meat Industry Research Institute of New Zealand   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Beef; Probe; Shear; Tenderness; Tenderness prediction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034378077     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00014-0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Research guidelines for cookery, sensory evaluation, and instrumental tenderness measurements of fresh meat. 1995;American Meat Science Association and National Live Stock and Meat Board, Chicago, IL.
2. Bratzler L.J. Palatability factors and evaluation. Price J.F., Schweigert B.S. The science of meat and meat products. 1974;328-340 Food and Nutrition Press, Inc, Westport, CT.
3. Jeremiah, L. E. (1978). A review of factors affecting meat quality. Lacombe Res. Stn. Tech. Bull. No. 1, Lacombe, AB.
4. Jeremiah L.E. A review of factors influencing consumption, selection, and acceptability of meat purchases. J. Cons. Stud. Home Econ. 6:1982;137-154.
5. Jeremiah, L. E., Gibson, L. L., & Burwash, K. L. (1997). Descriptive sensory analysis. The profiling approach. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Res. Br. Tech. Bull. No. 1997-2E, Lacombe, AB.
6. Jeremiah L.E., Newman J.A., Tong A.K.W., Gibson L.L. The effect of castration, preslaughter stress, and zeranol implants on beef. I. The texture of loin steaks from bovine males. Meat Science. 22:1988;83-102.
7. Jeremiah L.E., Tong A.K.W., Jones S.D.M., McDonell C. Consumer acceptance of beef with different levels of marbling. J. Cons. Stud. Home Econ. 16:1992;375-387.
8. Jones S.D.M., Jeremiah L.E., Tong A.K.W., Lutz S., Robertson W.M. The effects of marbling level, electrical stimulation, and postmortem aging on the cooking and palatability properties of beef rib-eye steaks. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 71:1991;1037-1043.
9. McDonell, C. (1990). Canadian consumer perceptions of beef. Conception to Consumption. Conf., Brandon, MB, 13-14 November.
10. Phillips D.M. A new technique for measuring meat texture and tenderness. Proc. 38th International Cong. Meat Sci. Technol. 38(5):1992;959-962.
11. Puri S.C., Mullen K. Applied statistics for food and agricultural scientists. 1980;G.K. Hall Med. Publ, Boston, MA.
12. SAS (1990). User's guide: statistics. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems, Inc.
13. Shackelford S.D., Wheeler T.L., Koohmaraie M. Tenderness classification of beef. II. Design and analysis of a system to measure beef Longissimus shear force under commercial processing conditions. Journal of Animal Science. 77(6):1999;1474-1481.
14. Szczesniak A.S. Correlations between objective and sensory texture measurements. Food Technology. 22:1968;981-986.
15. Szczesniak A.S., Torgeson K.W. Methods of meat texture measurement as viewed from the background of factors affecting tenderness. Advances in Food Research. 14:1965;33-165.
16. Warner, K. E. (1928). Progress report of the mechanical test for tenderness of meat. Proc. Am. Soc. Anim. Prod., 114-116.
17. Weir, C. T. (1960). Palatability characteristics of meat. In The science of meat and meat products (pp. 212-221). American Meat Inst. Found W.H. Freemen and Company, San Francisco, CA.