Geometrical evaluation of star products

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 5129-5134

  Zachos, Cosmas ^a  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034377965     PISSN: 00222488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.533395     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. H. Groenewold, Physica (Amsterdam) 12, 405 (1946).
2. Further explored by F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, A. Lichnerowicz, and D. Sternheimer, Ann. Phys. (NY) 111, 61 (1978); F. Hansen, Rep. Math. Phys. 19, 361-381 (1984); reviewed by C. Roger and V. Ovsienko, Russ. Math. Surv. 47, 135-191 (1992).
3. Further explored by F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, A. Lichnerowicz, and D. Sternheimer, Ann. Phys. (NY) 111, 61 (1978); F. Hansen, Rep. Math. Phys. 19, 361-381 (1984); reviewed by C. Roger and V. Ovsienko, Russ. Math. Surv. 47, 135-191 (1992).
4. Further explored by F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, A. Lichnerowicz, and D. Sternheimer, Ann. Phys. (NY) 111, 61 (1978); F. Hansen, Rep. Math. Phys. 19, 361-381 (1984); reviewed by C. Roger and V. Ovsienko, Russ. Math. Surv. 47, 135-191 (1992).
5. J. Moyal, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 45, 99-124 (1949).
6. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. 9909, 032 (1999).
7. T. Curtright, D. Fairlie, and C. Zachos, Phys. Rev. D 58, 025002 (1998).
8. G. Baker, Phys. Rev. 109, 2198-2206 (1958); formally underlain by J. v. Neumann, Math. Ann. 104, 570-578 (1931); also see D. Fairlie, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 60, 581-586 (1964); further see review by F. Berezin, Sov. Phys. Usp. 23, 763-787 (1980).
9. G. Baker, Phys. Rev. 109, 2198-2206 (1958); formally underlain by J. v. Neumann, Math. Ann. 104, 570-578 (1931); also see D. Fairlie, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 60, 581-586 (1964); further see review by F. Berezin, Sov. Phys. Usp. 23, 763-787 (1980).
10. G. Baker, Phys. Rev. 109, 2198-2206 (1958); formally underlain by J. v. Neumann, Math. Ann. 104, 570-578 (1931); also see D. Fairlie, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 60, 581-586 (1964); further see review by F. Berezin, Sov. Phys. Usp. 23, 763-787 (1980).
11. G. Baker, Phys. Rev. 109, 2198-2206 (1958); formally underlain by J. v. Neumann, Math. Ann. 104, 570-578 (1931); also see D. Fairlie, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 60, 581-586 (1964); further see review by F. Berezin, Sov. Phys. Usp. 23, 763-787 (1980).
12. P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1958), Chap. 1.4.
13. F. Bayen, in Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, edited by W. Beiglböck et al. [Lect. Notes Phys. 94, 260-271 (1979)]; A. Voros, Phys. Rev. A 40, 6814-6825 (1989).
14. F. Bayen, in Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, edited by W. Beiglböck et al. [Lect. Notes Phys. 94, 260-271 (1979)]; A. Voros, Phys. Rev. A 40, 6814-6825 (1989).
15. K. Takahashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 98, 109-156 (1989).
16. J. Vey, Comment Math. Helv. 50, 421-454 (1975); W. Arveson, Commun. Math. Phys. 89, 77 (1983); P. Fletcher, Phys. Lett. B 248, 323-328 (1990).
17. J. Vey, Comment Math. Helv. 50, 421-454 (1975); W. Arveson, Commun. Math. Phys. 89, 77 (1983); P. Fletcher, Phys. Lett. B 248, 323-328 (1990).
18. J. Vey, Comment Math. Helv. 50, 421-454 (1975); W. Arveson, Commun. Math. Phys. 89, 77 (1983); P. Fletcher, Phys. Lett. B 248, 323-328 (1990).
19. D. Fairlie and C. Zachos, Phys. Lett. B 224, 101-107 (1989).
20. D. Fairlie, P. Fletcher, and C. Zachos, Phys. Lett. B 218, 203-206 (1989).
21. E. Fradkin and V. Linetsky, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 217-224 (1991); see also F. Berezin and M. Marinov, Ann. Phys. (NY) 104, 336-362 (1977).
22. E. Fradkin and V. Linetsky, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 217-224 (1991); see also F. Berezin and M. Marinov, Ann. Phys. (NY) 104, 336-362 (1977).