Nonlinear Comparison of High-order and Optimized Finite-difference Schemes

International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 259-277

  Hixon, R ^a  

^a NASA GLENN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational aeroacoustics; Dispersion relation preserving schemes; High order finite differences; Nonlinear wave propagation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034371022     PISSN: 10618562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10618560008940902     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Carpenter, M. H., Gottlieb, D. and Abarbanel, S. (1993) Stable and Accurate Boundary Treatments for Compact, High-Order Finite-Difference Schemes, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 12, 55-87.
2. Casper, J. and Carpenter, M. H. (1995) Computational Considerations for the Simulation of Shock-Induced Sound, NASA Technical Memorandum 110222, Hampton, Virginia.
3. Gottlieb, D. and Turkel, E. (1976) Dissipative Two-Four Method for Time Dependent Problems, Mathematics of Computation, 30, 703-723.
4. Haras, Z. and Ta'asan, S. (1994) Finite-Difference Schemes for Long-Time Integration, J. Comp. Physics, 114, 265-279.
5. Harten, A., Enquist, A., Osher, S. and Chakravarthy, S. (1987) Uniformly High Order Accuracy Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes III', J. Comp. Phys., 71, 231-323.
6. Hixon, R. (1998a) Evaluation of a High-Accuracy MacCormack-Type Scheme Using Benchmark Problems, J. Comp. Acoust., 6, 291-305.
7. Hixon, R. and Turkel, E. (1998b) High-Accuracy Compact MacCormack-Type Schemes for Computational Aeroacoustics, AIAA Paper 98-0365, AIAA 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada.
8. Hixon, R. (1998c) A New Class of Compact Schemes, AIAA Paper 98-0367, AIAA 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada.
9. Hu, F. Q., Hussaini, M. Y. and Manthey, J. (1996) Low-Dissipation and Dispersion Runge-Kutta Schemes for Computational Acoustics, J. Comp. Phys., 124, 121-133.
10. Kennedy, C. A. and Carpenter, M. H. (1994) Several New Numerical Methods for Compressible Shear-Layer Simulations, Appl. Num. Math., 14, 397-433.
11. Lele, S. K. (1992) Compact Finite Difference Schemes with Spectral-like Resolution, J. Comp. Phys., 103, 16-42.
12. Meadows, K. R., Casper, J. and Caughey, D. A. (1993) A Numerical Investigation of Sound Amplification by a Shock Wave, FED-Vol. 147, Computational Aero- and Hydro-Acoustics, ASME, pp. 47-52.
13. Stanescu, D. and Habashi, W. G. (1998) 2N-Storage Low Dissipation and Dispersion Runge-Kutta Schemes for Computational Acoustics, J. Comp. Phys., 143, 674-681.
14. Tam, C. K. W. and Shen, H. (1993a) Direct Computation of Nonlinear Acoustic Pulses Using High Order Finite Difference Schemes, AIAA Paper 93-4325, 15th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, Long Beach, CA.
15. Tam, C. K. W. and Webb, J. C. (1993b) Dispersion-Relation-Preserving Finite Difference Schemes for Computational Acoustics, J. Comp. Phys., 107, 262-281.
16. Whitham, G. B. (1974) Linear and Nonlinear Waves, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
17. Zingg, D. W., Lomax, H. and Jurgens, H. M. (1993) An Optimized Finite-Difference Scheme for Wave Propagation Problems, AIAA Paper 93-0459, AIAA 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada.
18. Zingg, D. Q., 'A Review of High-order and Optimized Finite-Difference Methods for Simulating Linear Wave Phenomena', AIAA Paper 97-2088, AIAA 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass, Colorado.