Sitting vs. Standing Isokinetic Trunk Extension and Flexion Performance Differences

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 310-315

  Findley, Brian W ^a   Brown, Lee E ^b   Whitehurst, Michael ^b   Gilbert, Russell ^c   Groo, Denise R ^d   O'Neal, Julie ^c  

^a Jupiter Medical Center   (United States)

^b ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Med Research   (United States)

^d South Palm Orthopedics   (United States)

Author keywords

Length tension relationship; Position specific testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034370689     PISSN: 10648011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1519/00124278-200008000-00011     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. AMBROSIUS, F.M., A.M. KREMER, S.R. BARTZ, AND RB. HERKNER. A preliminary comparison of isokinetic data among back-injured surgical and nonsurgical patients, and the effect of a functional restoration program on their ability to return to work. Isokin Exerc. Sci. 4:34-40. 1994.
2. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 1993.
3. BAECHLE, T.R. Essentials of Strength and Conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994.
4. BEIMBORN, D.S., AND M.C. MORRISSEY. A review of the literature relating to trunk muscle performance. Spine 13:655-660. 1988.
5. BROWN, L.E., M. WHITEHURST, AND J.R. BRYANT. Reliability of the LIDO Active isokinetic dynamometer concentric mode. Isokin Exerc. Sci. 2(4):191-194. 1992.
6. BROWN, L.E., M. WHITEHURST, B.W. FINDLEY, R. GILBERT, D.R. GROO, AND J.A. JIMENEZ. Effect of repetitions and gender on acceleration range of motion during knee extension on an isokinetic device. J. Strength Cond. Res. 12:222-225. 1998.
7. CALÉ-BENZOOR, M., M. ALBERT, A. GRODIN, AND L.D. WOODRUFF. Isokinetic trunk muscle performance characteristics of classical ballet dancers. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 15:99-105. 1992.
8. DAVIES, G.J. A Compendium of Isokinetics in Clinical Usage. LaCross, WI: S & S, 1987.
9. DELITTO, A., C.E. CRANDELL, AND J. ROSE. Peak torque to body weight ratios in the trunk: a critical analysis. Phys. Ther. 69:138-143. 1989.
10. DVIR, Z. Isokinetics: Muscle Testing, Interpretation, and Clinical Applications. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1995.
11. FRIEDLANDER, A.L., J.E. BLOCK, N.N. BYL, H.A. STUBBS, H.S. SADOWSKY, AND H.K. GENANT. Isokinetic limb and trunk muscle performance testing: short-term reliability. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 14:220-224. 1991.
12. GUYTON, A.C. Textbook of Medical Physiology (8th ed.). Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991.
13. LIDO MULTI-JOINT II USER'S GUIDE. West Sacramento, CA: Loredan Biomedical, Inc., 1992.
14. MAWDSLEY, R.H., AND B.J. CROFT. The effects of submaximal contractions on an isokinetic test session. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 4:74-77. 1982.
15. MAYER, T.G., S.S. SMITH, J. KEELEY, AND V. MOONEY. Quantification of lumbar function, part 2: sagittal plane trunk strength in chronic low-back patients. Spine 10(8):765-772. 1985.
16. OSTERNIG, L.R. Isokinetic dynamometry: implications for muscle testing and rehabilitation. Exercise and Sports Science Reviews (vol. 14). K.B. Pandolf (ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1986.
17. PATTERSON, L.A., AND W.E. SPIVEY. Validity and reliability of the LIDO Active isokinetic system. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 15(1):32-36. 1992.
18. PERRIN, D.H. Isokinetic Exercise and Assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1993.
19. ROSE, S.J., A. DELITTO, AND C.E. CRANDELL. Reliability of isokinetic measures of trunk performance. Spine 7:800-803. 1991.
20. THOMPSON, N.N., J.A. GOULD, G.J. DAVIES, D.E. ROSS, AND S. PRICE. Descriptive measures of isokinetic trunk testing. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 7-43-49. 1985.