Appealing judgments

RAND Journal of Economics

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 502-525

  Daughety, Andrew F ^a   Reinganum, Jennifer F ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034368550     PISSN: 07416261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2600998     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ACZÉL, J. Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications. New York: Academic Press, 1966.
2. _ AND DHOMBRES, J. Functional Equations in Several Variables. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
3. BRAEUTIGAM, R., OWEN, B.M., AND PANZAR, J. "An Economic Analysis of Alternative Fee-Shifting Systems." Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 47 (1984), pp. 173-185.
4. COFFIN, F.M. On Appeal: Courts, Lawyering, and Judging. New York: W.W. Norton, 1994.
5. DANZON, P.M. "Contingent Fees for Personal Injury Litigation." Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 14 (1983), pp. 213-224.
6. DAUGHETY, A.F. AND REINGANUM, J.F. "Keeping Society in the Dark: On the Admissibility of Pretrial Negotiations as Evidence in Court." RAND Journal of Economics. Vol. 26 (1995), pp. 203-221.
7. _ AND _. "Stampede to Judgment: Persuasive Influence and Herding Behavior by Courts." American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 1 (1999), pp. 158-189.
8. _ AND _. "On the Economics of Trials: Adversarial Process, Evidence and Equilibrium Bias." Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, forthcoming.
9. FARMER, A. AND PECORINO, P. "Does Jury Bias Matter?" International Review of Law and Economics, forthcoming.
10. FROEB, L.M. AND KOBAYASHI, B.H. "Competition in the Production of Costly Information: An Economic Analysis of Adversarial Versus Court-Appointed Presentation of Expert Testimony." Working Paper, Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, August 1993.
11. _ AND _. "Naive, Biased, yet Bayesian: Can Juries Interpret Selectively Produced Evidence?" Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 12 (1996), pp. 257-276.
12. FOSTER, J.E. AND SHNERYEROV, A. "Path Independent Inequality Measures." Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 91 (2000), pp. 199-222.
13. Goldsboro Christian Schools, Inc. v. U.S. and Bob Jones University v. U.S., 456 U.S. 922 (U.S. Sup. Ct., 1982).
14. GRAHAM, M.H. Federal Rules of Evidence in a Nutshell, 3d ed. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co., 1992.
15. HARDY, G., LITTLEWOOD, J.E., AND PÓLYA, G. Inequalities, 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952.
16. HAUSE, J.C. "Indemnity, Settlement, and Litigation, or, I'll Be Suing You." Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 18 (1989), pp. 157-179.
17. JAMES, F., JR. AND HAZARD, G.C., JR. Civil Procedure, 3d ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1985.
18. KATZ, A. "Measuring the Demand for Litigation: Is the English Rule Really Cheaper?" Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 3 (1987), pp. 143-176.
19. _. "Judicial Decisionmaking and Litigation Expenditure." International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 8 (1988), pp. 127-143.
20. LANDES, W.M. "Sequential Versus Unitary Trials: An Economic Analysis." Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 22 (1993), pp. 99-134.
21. LEWIS, T.R. AND POITEVIN, M. "Disclosure of Information in Regulatory Proceedings." Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 13 (1997), pp. 50-73.
22. LIPMAN, B.L. AND SEPPI, D.J. "Robust Inference in Communication Games with Partial Provability." Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 66 (1995), pp. 370-405.
23. MILGROM, P.R. AND WEBER, R.J. "A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding." Econometrica, Vol. 50 (1982), pp. 1089-1122.
24. _ AND ROBERTS, J. "Relying on the Information of Interested Parties." RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 17 (1986), pp. 18-32.
25. PLOTT, C.R. "Legal Fees: A Comparison of the American and English Rules." Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 3 (1987), pp. 185-192.
26. POSNER, R.A. The Federal Courts: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.
27. _. Economic Analysis of Law, 5th ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1998.
28. _. "An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence." Stanford Law Review, Vol. 51 (1999), pp. 1477-1546.
29. In re Rhone-Poulenc Rarer Inc., 51 F.3d 1293, (7th Circuit, 1995).
30. RUBINFELD, D.L. AND SAPPINGTON, D.E.M. "Efficient Awards and Standards of Proof in Judicial Proceedings." RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 18 (1987), pp. 308-315.
31. SANCHIRICO, C.W. "Enforcement by Hearing: An Integrated Model of Evidence Production." Working Paper no. 9798-05, Department of Economics, Columbia University, 1997a.
32. _. "Evidence Production, Adversarial Process and the Private Instigation of Suits." Working Paper no. 9798-06, Department of Economics, Columbia University, 1997b.
33. _. "The Burden of Proof in Civil Litigation: A Simple Model of Mechanism Design." International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 17 (1997c), pp. 431-447.
34. SEIDMANN, D.J. AND WINTER, E. "Strategic Information Transmission with Verifiable Messages." Econometrica, Vol. 65 (1997), pp. 163-169.
35. SHAVELL, S. "The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction." Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 24 (1995), pp. 379-426.
36. SHEPHERD, G.B. "An Empirical Study of the Economics of Pretrial Discovery." International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 19 (1999), pp. 245-263.
37. SHIN, H.S. "The Burden of Proof in a Game of Persuasion." Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 64 (1994), pp. 253-264.
38. _. "Adversarial and Inquisitorial Procedures in Arbitration." RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 29 (1998), pp. 378-405.
39. SKAPERDAS, S. "Contest Success Functions." Economic Theory, Vol. 7 (1996), pp. 283-290.
40. SOBEL, J. "Disclosure of Evidence and Resolution of Disputes: Who Should Bear the Burden of Proof?" In A.E. Roth, ed., Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
41. SPITZER, M. AND TALLEY, E. "Judicial Auditing." Working Paper no. 98-22, University of Southern California Law School, October 1998.
42. YEAZELL, S.C. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with Selected Statutes. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1996.