Central bank intervention and exchange rates: The case of Sweden

Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money

Volumn 10, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 303-322

  Aguilar, Javiera ^a   Nydahl, Stefan ^b  

^a SVERIGES RIKSBANK   (Sweden)

^b Quantal International Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Central bank; Exchange rate; Intervention; Volatility

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034365776     PISSN: 10424431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1042-4431(00)00041-X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Almekinders, G.J., 1995. Foreign Exchange Intervention. Edward Elgar Publishing, Hants, UK.
2. Baillie, T.R., Osterberg, W.P., 1997. Why do central banks intervene. J. Int. Money Finance 16, 909-919.
3. Black, F., Scholes, M.S., 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Polit. Econ. 3, 637-654.
4. Bollerslev, T., 1986. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J. Econometrics 31, 307-327.
5. Bollerslev, T., Wooldrige, J.M., 1992. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariances. Econometric Rev. 11, 143-172.
6. Bonser-Neal, C., Tanner, G., 1996. Central bank intervention and the volatility of foreign exhange rates: evidence from the options market. J. Int. Money Finance 15, 853-878.
7. Dominguez, M.K.,1996. The international evidence: an assessment of experience with the foreign exchange intervention in the G-3, manuscript, Harvard University.
8. Dominguez, M.K., 1998. Central Bank intervention and exchange rate volatility. J. Int. Money Finance 17, 161-190.
9. Edison, J.H., 1993. The effectiveness of Central-Bank intervention: a survey of the literature after 1982. In: Special Papers in International Economics, vol. 18. Princeton University.
10. Engle, R.F., 1982. Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of UK inflation. Econometrica 50, 987-1007.
11. Garman, M.B., Kohlhagen, S.W., 1983. Foreign currency option values. J. Int. Money Finance 12, 368-389.
12. Gosh, A., 1992. Is it signalling? Exchange intervention and the dollar-deutschemark rate. J. Int. Econ. 32, 201-220.
13. Humpage, O.F., 1989. On the effectiveness of exchange-market intervention, manuscript. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
14. Hung, H.J., 1997. Intervention strategies and exchange rate volatility: a noise trading perspective. J. Int. Money Finance 16, 779-793.
15. Jorion, P., 1995. Predicting volatility in the foreign exchange market. J. Finance 50, 507-528.
16. Kaminsky, L.G., Lewis, K., 1996. Does foreign exchange intervention signal future monetary policy. J. Monetary Econ. 37, 285-312.
17. Kortian, T.K., 1995. Modern approaches to asset price formation: a survey of the recent theoretical literature. Research Discussion Paper, Reserve Bank of Australia, WP 9501.
18. Lewis, K.K., 1988. Testing the portfolio balance model: a multi-lateral approach. J. Int. Econ. 24, 109-127.
19. Lindberg, H., 1994. The effects of sterilized interventions through the signalling channel, Sweden 1986-1990. Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper Number 19.
20. Lindberg, H., Mitlid K., Sellin, P., 1997. Monetary tactics with an inflation target: the Swedish case. BIS Conference Papers, vol. 3, Implementations and Tactic of Monetary Policy, Bank of International Settlement.
21. Lyons, R., 1997. Options and the currency risk premium. In: Chen, Zhaoui (Ed.), Currency Options and Exchange Rate Economics. World Scientific Publishing.
22. Obstfeld, M., 1989. The effectiveness of foreign exchange intervention. In: NBER Working Paper, p. 2786.
23. Rogoff, K., 1984. On the effects of sterilized intervention: an analysis of weekly data. J. Monetary Econ. 14, 133-150.
24. Wallace, N., 1979. Why markets in foreign exchange are different from other markets. In: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review.
25. White, H., 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48, 817-838.