Where Have All the Psychoanalytic Patients Gone? They're Still Here

Psychoanalytic Inquiry

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 503-526

  Wallerstein, Robert S ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Faculty at the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis and Faculty at the Psychoanalytic Institute of Northern California   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034365709     PISSN: 07351690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07351692009348904     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bibring, E. (1954), Psychoanalysis and the dynamic psychotherapies. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:745-770.
2. Brauer, L. D. (1998), 1996 survey of psychoanalytic practice highlights. Amer. Psychoanal., 32:20, 24.
3. Eissler, K. R. (1953), The effects of the structure of the ego on psychoanalytic technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 1:104-143.
4. Engelbrecht, H. (1997), Report of the ad hoc committee on "The Crisis of Psychoanalysis - Challenges and Perspectives." "Welcome to the Crisis." Newsletter Internat. Psychoanal. Assn., 6:53-59.
5. Freud, S. (1910), "Wild" psycho-analysis. Standard Edition, 11:219-227. London: Hogarth Press, 1957.
6. _ (1913), On beginning the treatment (further recommendations on the technique of psychoanalysis I). Standard Edition, 12:121-144. London: Hogarth Press, 1958.
7. Gill, M. M. (1954), Psychoanalysis and exploratory psychotherapy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:771-797.
8. _ (1984), Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: A revision. Internat. Rev. Psycho-Anal., 11:161-179.
9. _ (1994), Psychoanalysis in Transition: A Personal View. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
10. Joseph, E. D. & Widlocher, D. (1983), The Identity of the Psychoanalyst. New York: International Universities Press.
11. Knight, R. P. (1945), The relationship of psychoanalysis to psychiatry. Amer. J. Psychiat., 101:777-782.
12. _ (1949), A critique of the present status of the psychotherapies. Bull. NY Acad. Med., 25:100-114.
13. _ (1952), An evaluation of psychotherapeutic techniques. Bull. Menn. Clin., 16:113-124.
14. Lipton, S. D. (1977), The advantages of Freud's technique as shown in his analysis of the rat man. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 58:255-273.
15. Loewald, H. W. (1960), On the therapeutic action of psycho-analysis. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 41:16-33.
16. Panels (1954), The widening scope of indications for psychoanalysis, the traditional psychoanalytic technique and its variations, psychoanalysis and dynamic psychotherapy: Similarities and differences. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:565-797.
17. Rangell, L. (1954), Similarities and differences between psychoanalysis and dynamic psychotherapy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:734-744.
18. _ (1981), Psychoanalysis and dynamic psychotherapy: Similarities and differences twenty-five years later. Psychoanal. Quart., 50:665-693.
19. Rothstein, A. (1998), Psychoanalytic Technique and the Creation of Analytic Patients. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
20. Schafer, R. (1985), Wild analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33:275-299.
21. Skolnick, N. J. (1998), Psychoanalysis on (and off?) the couch: A relational perspective. NIPPA Rev., Spring, 25-30.
22. Stone, L. (1954), The widening scope of indications for psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:567-594.
23. _ (1961), The Psychoanalytic Situation: An Examination of Its Development and Essential Nature. New York: International Universities Press.
24. Wallerstein, R. S. (1986), Forty-Two Lives in Treatment: A Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
25. _ (1988), Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: Relative roles reconsidered. Annual Psychoanal., 16:129-151.
26. _ (1989), Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: A historical perspective. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 70:563-591.
27. _ (1995), The Talking Cures: The Psychoanalyses and the Psychotherapies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.