When will grievants desire voice?: A test of situational, motivational, and attributional explanations

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 106-134

  Barry, Bruce ^b   Shapiro, Debra L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034363078     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022837     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York: Sage.
2. Brett, J. M. (1986). Commentary on procedural justice papers. In R. Lewicki, M. Bazerman, & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 81-90). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3. Brockner, J., & Siegel, P. (1996). Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 390-413). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Darlington, R. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161-182.
5. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
6. Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44-56.
7. Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.
8. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
9. Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-501.
10. Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal decisions. Journal of Management, 21, 657-669.
11. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
12. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Early, C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
13. Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I., & Conlon, D. E. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 338-350.
14. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
15. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1993). Business without bosses: How self-managing teams are building high performance companies. New York: Wiley.
16. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 53-62.
17. Paese, P. W., Lind, E. A., & Kanfer, R. (1988). Procedural fairness and work group responses to performance evaluation systems. Social Justice Research, 2, 193-205.
18. Rosnow, R. L. (1980). Psychology of rumor reconsidered. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 578-591.
19. Shapiro, D. L. (1993). Reconciling theoretical differences among procedural justice researchers by re-evaluating what it means to have one's views "considered": Implications for third-party managers. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 51-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Shapiro, D. L., & Brett, J. M. (1993). Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1167-1177.
21. Shapiro, D. L., & Kolb, D. M. (1994). Reducing the litigious mentality by increasing employees' desire to communicate grievances. In S. Sitkin & R. Bies (Eds.), The legalistic organization (pp.304-326). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Tanaka, K. (1999). Judgments of fairness by just world believers. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 631-638.
23. Tavris, C. (1989). Anger: The misunderstood emotion. New York: Simon & Schuster.
24. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
25. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333-344.
26. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863.
27. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
28. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
29. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., & Spodick, N. (1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72-81.
30. Weiner, B. (1985). "Spontaneous" causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74-84.