GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency: Implications for state assessment programs

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 419-426

  Ward, Cynthia A ^a  

^a Harcourt Educational Measurement   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034361133     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15324818AME1304_08_1     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bennett, R. E. (1998). Reinventing assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
2. Debra P. v. Turlington, 564 F. Supp. 177 (M.D. Fla. 1983), aff d, 730 F. 2d 1405 (11th Cir. 1984).
3. GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency, No. SA-97-CA-1278-EP (GI Forum filed Jan. 7, 2000).
4. Mehrens, W. (1993). Issues and recommendations regarding implementation of high school graduation tests. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
5. National Association of State Boards of Education. (1997). Report of the NASBE study group on statewide assessment systems. Alexandria, VA: Author.
6. Phillips, S. (1994). Legal implications of high-stakes assessment: What states should know. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Educational Laboratory.
7. Southeastern Regional Vision for Education. (1995). Issues to consider in moving beyond a minimal competency high school graduation test. Greensboro: University of North Carolina.
8. Stake, R. E. (1995). The invalidity of standardized testing for measuring mathematics achievement. In L. V. Jones (Ed.), National tests and educational reform: Are they compatible? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.