Phenomenology, dynamical neural networks and brain function

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 213-228

  Borrett, Donald ^a   Kelly, Sean ^b   Kwan, Hon ^c  

^a TORONTO EAST GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034354918     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09515080050075690     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ARBIB, A. (1981). Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. American Physiological Society Handbook of Physiology: The Nervous System, 2, 1449-1480.
2. BEER, R.D. (1995). Computational and dynamical languages for autonomous agents. In Mind as motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition by components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
4. BIEDERMAN, I. (1995). Visual object recognition. In Visual cognition, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. BORRETT, D., YEAP, T. & KWAN, H. (1993). Neural networks and Parkinson's Disease. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 20, 107-113.
6. BULLOCK, D. & GROSSBERG, S. (1988). Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. In Neural networks and natural intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. DREYFUS, H. (1996). The current relevance of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of embodiment. In Perspectives on embodiment. New York & London: Routledge.
8. EDELMAN, S. & WEINSHALL, D. (1991). A self-organizing multiple-view representation of 3-D objects. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 209-219.
9. HEIDEGGER, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.
10. HOFF, B. & ARBIB, M. (1992). A model of the effects of speed, accuracy, and perturbation on visually guided reaching. Control of Arm Movements in Space: Neurophysiological and Computational Approaches, 22, 285-306.
11. HUSSERL, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
12. KWAN, H., YEAP, T., JIANG, B. & BORRETT, D. (1990). Neural network control of simple limb movements. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 68, 126-130.
13. LINSKER, R. (1986). From basic network principles to neural architecture (series). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 83, 7508-7512, 8390-8394, 8779-8783.
14. MARR, D. & NISHIHARA, H. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three dimensional space. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 200, 269-294.
15. MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
16. NAGEL, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435-450.
17. PETITOT, J. (1995). Morphodynamics and attractor syntax: constituency in visual perception and cognitive grammar. In Mind as motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. POGGIO, T. & EDELMAN, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
19. THELEN, E. (1995). Time-scale dynamics and the development of an embodied cognition. In Mind as motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. ULLMAN, S. & BASRI, R. (1991). Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intelligence, 13, 992-1005.
21. VAN GELDER, T. & PORT, R. (1995). It's about time: an overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In Mind as motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. VARELA, F. (1996). Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 330-349.
23. WOODWORTH, R.S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3, 1-114.
24. YOON, R.S., BORRETT, D.S. & KWAN, H.C. (1995). Three-dimensional object recognition using a recurrent neural network. Proceedings of the 17th annual international conference of IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, 503, 2.