|
Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 1719-1722
|
VO2/DO2 relationship: How to get rid of methodological pitfalls?
a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
OXYGEN;
CARDIOTONIC AGENT;
DOBUTAMINE;
ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION;
CRITICAL ILLNESS;
HEART OUTPUT;
HEMODILUTION;
HUMAN;
MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
METHODOLOGY;
NONHUMAN;
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION;
POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE;
RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME;
REVIEW;
SEPSIS;
SHOCK;
THERMOGENESIS;
ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME;
DRUG EFFECT;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
INTENSIVE CARE;
METABOLISM;
NOTE;
PHYSIOLOGY;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
STANDARD;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
CARDIAC OUTPUT;
CARDIOTONIC AGENTS;
CRITICAL CARE;
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
DOBUTAMINE;
HUMANS;
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION;
POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, ADULT;
|
EID: 0034353307
PISSN: 03424642
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s001340000713 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (15)
|
References (21)
|